Pixel Farming and Humanity’s Relationship with Nature

By Charlotte Moore

A few weeks ago, my family and I took a trip to New York City.  While we were there, we visited the Guggenheim Museum, where we were lucky to experience the “Countryside, The Future” exhibit that told the stories of rural innovations across the globe.  One of these particularly struck me: the Dutch concept of pixel farming. As a member of a peculiar subset of the human family who happens to adore math, I was struck by its attempt to combine Cartesian models with agriculture.

So, what is pixel farming?  Simply put, it is a solution to the problems created by agricultural monocultures.  When one crop is grown across thousands of neighboring acres, it creates more than a handful of problems.  The single crop attracts only a few species of insects, and thus pesticides and insecticides must be used. The crop depletes the soil, and the area’s biodiversity decays rapidly.  Cultivating these massive plots contributes to CO2 emissions and both air and water pollution.  

Pixel farming combats all these adverse effects.  A pixel farm looks like exactly what it sounds like: a grid of pixels, each representing a different crop.  At Campus Almwerk, the world’s first pixel farm, in the Netherlands, the nine-hectare farm is divided into 2 foot-by-2 foot plots.  Each plot is planted with a different crop, and its placement in the field is deliberately considered through analysis of other nearby crops and their root systems, soil preferences, and growth patterns.  The arrangement of plots is designed to test how the intimate proximity of different crops affects the crops’ interaction and the ecological balance of the farm.

And it has had drastic results.  Campus Almwerk has seen an increase in biodiversity and a 50% increase in crop yield.  The variety of crops attracts a diverse insect population that eliminates the need for insecticides, reducing the farm’s contribution to water pollution.  Planting similar crops apart from one another has also dramatically dampened the spread of disease among crop varieties. All these benefits lead to only one natural conclusion: is this the future of agriculture?

What is even more interesting and revolutionary about Campus Almwerk is its digitization.  The plots are planted, weeded, and harvested by an autonomous robot that controls the entire process.  Through onboard data analytics, it can adapt plots as needed. Additionally, the robot allows local consumers who have bought a plot to view their crops like a real-time, real-life version of FarmVille.

Although I find pixel farming incredibly fascinating and am interested in seeing how it affects farming going forward, I can’t help but wonder how it is affecting humankind’s relationship with the natural world.  On one hand, pixel farming appears to be a return to the sporadic nature of wild plant growth. After all, it is increasing variety and biodiversity and reducing the ecological impact of the farm. However, it also appears to be a meticulous attempt to control nature, to force it to work for humans instead of allowing it to act of its own volition, removing its surprises and spontaneity.  Maybe that’s not a bad thing, or maybe it is. I suppose it’s for humanity as a whole to decide. Going forward, how are we going to change our natural world? More importantly, will we allow it to change us?

 

 

Engwerda, Jan. “Pixel Farming: ‘Plots’ of 10 by 10 Centimeters.” Future Farming, Future Farming, 3 Feb. 2020.

Koekkoek, Arend. Pixel Farming: Farming in a digital era. July 2018. PowerPoint Presentation.

“Rem Koolhaas and AMO Explore Radical Change in the World’s Nonurban Territories in the Guggenheim Exhibition Countryside, The Future.”  Guggenheim Museum, February 2020.

Traveling in the Upstate: High Time for High-Speed?

Charlotte Moore

Anyone who has recently driven along Interstate 85 from Greenville to Atlanta or Charlotte knows how frustrating traveling through Upstate South Carolina is.  Construction, coupled with the sheer volume of traffic on the roads, has the potential to more than double the duration of any trip.

Even more concerning than the additional travel time for your weekend getaway, however, is the impact of this heavy traffic on the environment.  With weak (although improving!) public transportation in Greenville County and the surrounding areas, the Upstate suffers from severe automobile dependence.  The automobile is simply more convenient for most residents, so Greenville citizens pile into their cars and commute to work, travel across the state, or simply zip a mile or two down the road to the grocery store.  This is something I see quite often even on Furman’s campus, where students will hop in their car to go anywhere, even to simply drive to class. Although the car’s reliability may be convenient, it has some major drawbacks, including increased traffic and the obvious CO2 emissions.  Altogether, single-passenger cars are the opposite of sustainable transportation, defined by the Geography of Transport Systems as “the capacity to support the mobility needs of a society in a manner that is the least [damaging] to the environment and does not impair the mobility needs of future generations.”

 

Luckily, a solution may be coming to Upstate South Carolina in the near future.  In mid-October 2019, the Georgia Department of Transportation and the Federal Railroad Administration publicized their three proposals for a light rail system running between Charlotte and Atlanta.  The fastest and most expensive of the three options could make the trip in just two hours, half the time it takes to travel between the cities by car. More importantly, light rail transportation systems produce 62% less in greenhouse gas emissions per

Potential routes for the proposed high-speed railway

passenger mile than the average single occupancy vehicle, meaning that the adoption of such a light rail system could significantly reduce the impact of travel in the Upstate on the atmosphere.

However, only one of the three options proposed utilizes existing railway.  According to the Federal Transit Administration, the construction of new fixed rail transit facilities “normally have significant effects on the environment.”  These influences are detailed in the Environmental Impact Statement, and include impacts on air quality, noise pollution, wildlife, parklands and recreation areas, water resources, and biological resources. 

It remains to be seen what impact, if any, the construction of a high-speed railway would have on the Interstate 85 corridor.  The project is not yet definite, nor is it fully funded. Nevertheless, such an initiative could have a major impact on the development of sustainable transportation in the Upstate.

 

 

“Atlanta to Charlotte Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plan.” Georgia Department of Transportation, Georgia Department of Transportation, Mar. 2019, www.dot.ga.gov/InvestSmart/Rail/Documents/Atl-Char/05-Affected%20Environment.pdf.

Cavallaro, Gabe. “3 Options for High-Speed Rail Route That Could Connect Greenville to Atlanta, Charlotte.” The Greenville News, The Greenville News, 23 Oct. 2019, www.greenvilleonline.com/story/news/local/2019/10/23/multi-billion-dollar-rail-could-connect-greenville-atlanta-charlotte/4052926002/?fbclid=IwAR37cnyxCg-v9vTozW9N48ciUcXqIjk49GJft3efwlMpUPo7gtGVUwU1fLY.

Rodrigue, Jean-Paul. “Transport and Sustainability.” The Geography of Transport Systems, 18 Aug. 2019, transportgeography.org/?page_id=5725. 

“Transit’s Role in Environmental Sustainability.” Federal Transit Administration, United States Department of Transportation, 9 May 2016, www.transit.dot.gov/regulations-and-guidance/environmental-programs/transit-environmental-sustainability/transit-role.