The Marriage of Economics and Sustainability for an Efficient World

The principles of sustainability are all well and good within a vacuum. However, incentivizing individuals, firms, nations, and the world to follow these principles pose some additional challenges. One way that many experts have sought to spearhead sustainability within the US is through our economy. If we as a country, along with other capitalist states, can start associating carbon production, environmental damage, and inefficient business operations with a monetary and measurable cost, the economy will become sustainable in no time. Just watch.

 

In fundamental economics, a cost of production of a certain quantity not acknowledged by producers or consumers is defined as an externality. When these costs are recognized and price and quantity adjust as such, production stabilizes at what economists call the socially optimal quantity. Yvon Chouinard, Jib Elison, and Rick Ridgeway at Harvard Business Review classify this as ‘True Cost Accounting.’ “What if we could get to the point where the lowest-priced T-shirt was also the one doing the least harm to the planet and society? In that scenario, consumers’ bargain hunting would align perfectly with business practices that sustain a healthy and just world, and powerful market forces would be put in the service of sustainability’s goals. (Chouinard et. al). Recognizing externalities is a critical component of sustainable-ifying the economy. In almost every area of the private sector, there are adjustments that could be made to harness the buying power of consumers and the marketing power of producers for the good of the planet. In essence, sustainability scientists are asking economists to appraise the environment and smooth consumption cost over as long a period as possible, in hopes of reaching a point of such efficiency that our economy and the world around it become perpetual.

 

Many organizations are already dipping their toes into the water of advocacy for such business practices. The World Wildlife Fund and the United Nations both have extensive resources dedicated towards publicizing the cost of environmental harm. Both acknowledge the importance of economic activity and finance toward a sustainable revolution, and both have developed international goals to operate within the planet’s means. The WWF also focuses on investment as a key strategy in the development of a sustainable economy. Engaging with public financial officials, policy makers, and private advisory boards will only incentivize an analytical mindset when considering the burden of business on the Earth.

 

Decisions regarding sustainability within an economic context up until this point have been directed at the consequences of climate change. Extreme weather and pollution have begun to ravage many regions of the world, with finance and technology quickly rushing to aid. Instead, these resources could be directed at the root cause of climate change, an unchecked business world, and internalize an already very present external cost of climate change.

Connect4Climate’s Climate Countdown: Carbon Pricing video provides an expertly crafted visualization of the breakdown of resources, timelines, and combinations of the two that point toward more sustainable operations. In the video, John Hansen, a climate policy and clean energy advocate, describes the “adaptation and mitigation” of our reactionary approach to climate change as “throwing good [resources] money into a leaky system.” Hansen goes on to describe carbon pricing as the solution to correcting the global economy.

 

With these sources at hand, it is not hard to see how applying core economics to sustainability provides a viable avenue toward global change. What it ultimately comes down to is a just association between price and source. Currently, the burden of climate change and extreme climate is felt by the common consumer. Associating this burden with environmental harm, bolstering the economy in a way that promulgates sustainability, and harmonizing the global aspects of climate and business are the keys to concrete, tangible change for the betterment of the world.

 

Sources:

https://www.wwf.eu/what_we_do/sustainable_economies/#:~:text=A%20sustainable%20economy%20is%20one,below%202%C2%B0C%20threshold.

https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/economic-growth/

https://hbr.org/2011/10/the-sustainable-economy

 

Accessibility: On-Campus University Housing

What Does It Mean to be Accessible? 

“Accessible means a person with a disability is afforded the opportunity to acquire the same information, engage in the same interactions, and enjoy the same services as a person without a disability in an equally effective and equally integrated manner, with substantially equivalent ease of use,” (Disability Resource Office at NC State). 

Accessibility is vital to nurturing a healthy, safe, and inclusive culture on college campuses. Every person benefits from an inclusive culture (Burgstahler, 2018). However, making an accessible, inclusive culture in university housing goes far beyond having ramps, elevators, and other design choices you might expect. While ramps and elevators are obviously important, it is not uncommon for other needs of students with disabilities to be overlooked (Wisbey and Kalivoda, 2008). Unfortunately, these factors of inaccessibility on campuses are often found within shared student spaces in dorm halls, like common rooms, kitchens, and public bathrooms. Assessing the accessibility of residential buildings on college campuses can be generally categorized into building access, common rooms, bathrooms, and bedrooms. 

 

Building Access and Common Rooms

Doors, either automatically or electronically operated, into and within the building need to be wide enough for students in wheelchairs to comfortably enter. In common areas, like lounges and kitchens, having plenty of seating while still providing adequate space for wheelchairs goes a long way toward social inclusion within residential buildings. Of course, this is not an exhaustive list. 

Lack of access to and within residential buildings acts not only as a physical barrier, but a cultural one as well (Wisbey and Kalivoda, 2008). Even if there are other handi-accessible residential buildings, the mere presence of buildings like this sends the message to students with physical disabilities that there are fundamental differences between themselves and able-bodied students that can cause ‘othering’ and isolation. Physical and social exclusion creates spaces in which students with limited mobility legitimately cannot interact with other students. 

 

Bathrooms and Bedrooms

For many daily use objects, like light switches, sinks, and even toilets, height can limit the use for some students. Issues of inaccessibility in residential spaces disturb the transition to campus housing for students with disabilities (Wisbey and Kalivoda, 2008). 

Transitioning into college is difficult for most students, regardless of their ability status. While this change is disruptive for many students, students with disabilities may not have the same accommodations that they might have had access to while in high school and living at home. Students with mobility impairments experiencing these extra challenges may take more time to acclimate than those without such disabilities. Adjusting to new people, a new culture, and a new environment takes time, and this makes it difficult for many people to ask for help. 

 

Resources

For accessibility, usability and comfort ought to be priorities in housing, especially at universities with mandatory four-year on-campus housing. “If about 10 percent of college students have some kind of disability, they represent a significant group who deserves particular consideration.” (Haller, 2006).

  • Accessibility Barrier Report Form – “We want to ensure that Furman University is accessible to all members of our campus community. If you have noticed a potential barrier, let us know how we can help by completing the Accessibility Barrier Report Form,” (Furman University Student Office for Accessibility Resources).
  • Equal Access: Universal Design of Housing and Residential Life – “A checklist for making housing and residential life welcoming and accessible to everyone…This publication is a resource for campus housing and residential life staff and identifies key areas of concern, offers general guidance, and provides resources regarding disability access issues,” (Dr. Sheryl Burgstahler, University of Washington).

 

Citations

 

Burgstahler, Sheryl. 2018. “Equal Access: Universal Design of Housing and Residential Life”. DOIT. https://www.washington.edu/doit/sites/default/files/atoms/files/EA_Housing_0.pdf 

 

Heller, Beth A. 2006. “Promoting Disability-Friendly Campuses to Prospective Students:

An Analysis of University Recruitment Materials”. Disability Studies Quarterly 26, 2 (Spring). https://dsq-sds.org/index.php/dsq/article/view/673/850 

 

Martha E. Wisbey and Karen S. Kalivoda. 2008. “Residential Living For All: Fully Accessible and “Liveable” On-Campus Housing”. Pedagogy and Student Services for Institutional Transformation: Implementing Universal Design in Higher Education. 22:255-266. https://staff.tiiame.uz/storage/users/83/books/SNOv99cdqniYAFjBzBcRUFxaeq9WiUh5VsCkrGKP.pdf#page=265 

Green Gaming

How do we think about sustainability in our daily lives? It can be easy to consider the concept as one that’s entirely big-picture or out of our hands, or some kind of box to check so long as we recycle and watch how much of this or that we consume and produce, when in reality, there’s a great deal more to uncover. We can take steps towards environmentally-conscious lifestyles here and now—even if that comes in some unorthodox forms.

Video games are a rather common pastime nowadays, having grown in popularity since their rise to fame in the ‘70s and ‘80s. Starting from computer programs, moving to arcade cabinets, and settling today in the comfort of one’s own home, virtual entertainment has expanded to an empire—but as it increases in popularity, one can also find greater and greater increases in environmental effects. New consoles, new games, even new accessories often require a number of plastics and/or mined materials to be produced on the kind of global scale required to meet demands. These products often require specific methods to be disposed of properly, such as dedicated electronics recycling boxes one might find scattered around the US, but the effectiveness of these boxes can be iffy. After all, sometimes it just seems simpler to throw things in the garbage and forget about it.

The materials themselves aren’t the only environmental issue present in video games, either. Energy consumption plays a major role in this industry, an unsurprising fact given its technological nature. The energy consumed through gaming has been documented at levels as high as 34 terawatt-hours a year in 2020 (which is around $5 billion in energy expenditures!) Thankfully, some of the big names in gaming, Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo, are stepping up to the plate. All three have made statements, and some actions, toward a lessened, negated, or even negative footprint within upcoming years. Within households, this will hopefully take the form of more energy-efficient consoles, keeping consumption low without sacrificing the quality they aim to produce.

All of this is still big talk, though—what does that have to do with us? While we may not have as big a hand in helping or hindering as these companies do, there are still actions we can take, as well as information we can keep in mind, to contribute to environmentally-friendly gaming.

It’s important to note that gaming consoles are, in most cases, machines that operate via direct connection to a power outlet of some kind. In the same way that you can be conscious of keeping the lights on in an unoccupied room or making sure various appliances are unplugged, be sure to fully disconnect any devices that aren’t in use—while power buttons can switch consoles into a low-power or “sleep” mode, they still consume energy.

While it may depend on how many games you play, another factor to consider is game storage. The discs, chips, manuals, cases, and more that make up even just one game start to add up over time, and while avoiding them in favor of digital storage can be a smart move in terms of physical waste, it also adds to energy usage by the servers that store that data. If you’re the type of gamer who collects a lot of storage-heavy games—if you need to purchase more than your console comes with, for example—than maybe consider investing in physical storage cards. There are a number of options available for this, all of which are adept at holding multiple digital versions of games without the need for external servers.

While the digital world seems divorced from that of the real, physical place we all call home, they regardless affect one another as industries and awareness continue to grow. If you play as many games as I do, I hope that this has opened your eyes to that connection.

Sources:

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40869-019-00084-2

https://dundle.com/magazine/en/sustainability-video-games-how-green-is-next-gen-gaming/

https://earth.org/sustainability-and-the-video-gaming-industry/

https://www.activesustainability.com/sustainable-life/video-games-encourage-sustainable-behaviour/

Social Sustainability in Communities

   When we hear the word “sustainability” the first thing that pops into our head is usually “environment”. We usually focus on how human practices impact the physical environment, whether that’s pollution, material usage, animal impact, etc. Another topic of sustainability that has recently grown in importance is social sustainability. Social sustainability could be in terms of business practices or communities.

The main goals of community social sustainability are to create a society in which people work together to get equal opportunities for all people, create a safe and diverse community, and make sure that everyone living in the community has a chance to voice their opinions. As a community, they want to attract and retain residents from a variety of backgrounds. Ideal social sustainability creates a community that is supported in the present as well as the future.

Some issues that interfere with a community’s ability to be sustainable is racism and discrimination within schools, workplaces, and social interactions. For example, certain schools receive more funding than others which causes a gap in education between children.  Another major issue is the equality of basic health needs. The well-being of humans is a large factor in what makes a community sustainable. Easy access, or lack thereof, to medical help directly determines life expectancy and infant mortality.

So how can we improve social sustainability within a community? First, we must recognize and address deep rooted systematic inequalities. For example, African Americans experience higher levels of poverty compared to other racial groups today because of horrible events and laws that were placed in this country 200 years ago. Next, we must correct underlying subconscious beliefs and be able to listen to others. We must be able to listen to ideas that aren’t our own and admit that some might be better for the community. Third, we must implement these ideas through policy. Policies could include making more affordable housing, more physical and mental medical support, and creating more equal education opportunities. However, all these policies must stay within the budget and resources available to be able to sustain the programs for a long time. In addition to policies, communities should also create events to boost community moral and tie the community together. Communities can create carnivals, fairs, and park activities. In my hometown, Fairport, New York, a major event that brings my town together is Canal Days. This event lines the main street in our town with members of the community to sell their products. This boosts the economy in our town as well as the moral of the town. Just this one event helps our town become more socially sustainable.

So, the next time you hear the word “sustainability”, think about more than just how humans effect the environment and more about how the communities we live in affect us. Think about your own town and how socially sustainable it is through the policies that are in place and how the overall beliefs in your community affect those around you. Remember that for a community to be socially sustainable, everyone must have the right to voice their opinion, and everyone needs to be open to new ideas.

 

References

https://bradyhummel.medium.com/social-sustainability-and-community-economic-development-what-are-they-and-why-are-they-important-188af25dcc53

 

https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2020/09/02/five-things-about-social-sustainability-and-inclusion

 

https://bradyhummel.medium.com/social-sustainability-and-community-economic-development-what-are-they-and-why-are-they-important-188af25dcc53

 

https://www.adecesg.com/resources/faq/what-is-social-sustainability/

 

https://diversity.social/social-sustainability/

 

 

Sustainability in Soccer

In the last several decades, the potential damaging effects of climate change have been thrusted into light. Our generation has seen what will happen to the earth if no action is taken. More and more damaging effects of the lack of sustainable practices are being revealed as the years go on. Most of our attention is placed on huge industries and corporations that produce tons of waste and carbon dioxide emission, as many conservationists have tasked themselves with turning climate change around. However, one industry that is often overlooked is the sports industry, specifically soccer. Recently, sports have been under major criticism for lack of sustainable practices; soccer, the most popular sport in the world, has headlined this criticism, as the masses that watch and play this sport create a great amount of waste. Soccer stadiums alone consume tons of plastic, water, and electricity, and the fans produce mass amounts of waste. Individual soccer clubs have also contributed to these metrics behind the scenes. However, plans are currently being implemented both organizationally and operationally to combat climate change induced by soccer.

Operationally, huge soccer events around the world have begun to make changes to the game-day experience to create a more sustainable atmosphere; there is also much more work to do in this field. Simple additions to soccer stadiums may include reusable food and drink containers, compost centers for food waste, paper tickets, and solar panels and wind turbines to reduce energy use. Sporting arenas can also lower carbon footprint by implementing electric vehicle charging stations on site. Transportation currently causes 29% of all U.S. air pollution, and this change could influence fans to buy electric vehicles more readily.

Organizationally, soccer clubs around the world have begun to act more sustainably as well. According to a recent statistic, only 11% of soccer clubs around the world have a strategy to address sustainability. A board called the UN Sports for climate action framework has been created to address sustainability at a club level within the sport, and only four major European teams have joined. Several clubs have taken direct action to reduce their climate footprint. For example, Manchester City Football Club has recently created a coffee cup that one may eat. This may eventually go a long way in reducing the 2.5 billion disposable cups thrown away in the UK every year. Johann Cruyff Arena in Amsterdam, owned by Ajax Football Club, is a newly created sustainable stadium with features such as 4200 solar panels and wind turbines.

 

One club in particular that has captured recent headlines is English club Forest Green Rovers, the most sustainable soccer club in the world. All of Forest Green Rovers’ kits and training gear is made out of recycled plastic, coffee grounds, and bamboo. For players and fans, the club has committed to serving all vegan food on match days, as going vegan has been shown to reduce carbon footprint tremendously. The club’s current stadium, The New Lawn, has the world’s first organic soccer pitch and a local habitat for wildlife around the stadium. Forest Green Rovers have also pledged to offset the carbon emissions generated by every single fan that travels to the stadium to watch the match. In the past several years, the club have decreased their carbon footprint by 3%, decreased waste production by 14%, and recycled over 8% of water used.

Soccer, being the most popular sport in the world, has a responsibility to become more sustainable, both operationally (at matches) and organizationally (at the club level). Patrick Gasser, head of Football and Social Responsibility in Europe, said, “It’s important to run a football club or organization as a socially responsible business.” Sustainability campaigns from sports teams also have a very high change of influencing fan behavior. If more teams can adopt sustainable practices likeForest Green Rovers, the effects would ripple throughout the world.

 

References:

https://medium.com/climate-conscious/how-football-clubs-should-market-sustainability-fd499b7bd5c0

https://www.amplifiedsoccerathlete.com/coachguide/how-are-soccer-events-becoming-more-sustainable

https://www.ecowatch.com/soccer-sustainability-2654946993.html

https://unfccc.int/climate-action/momentum-for-change/climate-neutral-now/creating-the-greenest-football-club-in-the-world-forest-green-rovers

https://formnutrition.com/us/inform/how-forest-green-rovers-became-the-greenest-football-club-in-the-world/