Small Changes—Big Difference

Small Changes—Big Difference
Claire Maybin

Living in the Greenbelt this past year has encouraged me to make more sustainable choices in my everyday life. Now, the challenge is taking the habits that became norms in the Greenbelt and continuing them while at home and wherever we each may live next. It is not likely that everyone in the word will become a vegetarian, or commit to zero waste, or strive to live a carbon neutral life, but there are small changes that everyone can do that cumulatively can make a big difference. Many of these initiatives that revolve around emissions, pollution, waste, etc., are trying to address huge systems that are interconnected and often difficult to present solutions. Waste, for instance, is not simply the discards of individual mass consumption it also comprises the waste generated at each phase of production, in mines or fields, in factories and shops, all of which far exceed consumer waste—and a few small changes can decrease that supply chain and production chain, reducing waste, and the products you choose can also decrease your waste footprint.

One initiative I have been particularly fond of embracing has been sustainable beauty products! I have recently started using a shampoo bar from lush, replacing large clunky plastic containers with this small little coffee infused bar. Lush, a cosmetic brand, pride themselves in their handmade products that are sourced ethically and are offered without any plastic packaging. Their shampoo bars are concentrated shampoo so a little goes a long way; one bar could equal up to three bottles of liquid shampoo. This is just a small change but think about the huge difference it would make if everyone used bar shampoos! Second, I ditched the liquid body wash and liquid hand soap, and both were replaced with good old fashion bar soap. My favorite has been Red Clay Soap from a local goat farm in the Traveler’s Rest area. This sweet soap contains up to 25% goat milk in each bar. The great thing about goat milk is that it is loaded with natural acids, vitamins and minerals making it the perfect exfoliator and moisturizer. Again, a simple switch but one that cumulatively makes a significant difference. Bar soaps and bar shampoos use little to no packaging and do not contain harmful chemicals that other liquid alternatives may. One small step towards less waste, a successful step towards sustainability.

Goat Milk Soap, Handmade Goat Milk Soap. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.redclaysoap.com/

Lush Shampoo Bars. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.lushusa.com/hair/shampoo-bars/

Murray, R. (2002). Zero waste. London: Greenpeace Environmental Trust.

Fast Fashion Feeds the Never Satiated Beast of Consumption

Claire Maybin

Fast fashion is inexpensive, constantly changing, mass produced clothing (Bick et al.).

Increased consumption encourages the production of cheap clothing. The United States consumes more clothing that any other nation in the world.  A large hinderance from sustainability is this consumption culture that we live in today.

Model for sustainability

The model widely used for sustainability is Raworth’s donut model. To summarize this model without going into too much depth; it illustrates how in order to achieve true sustainability we must not destroy the earths life sustaining services through over use and abuse– exceed the planetary boundaries but we must also not neglect human rights and human needs—pass the social foundation. There is a delicate balance between the two that we must strive to stay between. (Raworth)

Unsustainable fashion

Fast fashion is extremely unsustainable from the very beginning of the supply chain.

Textile dyeing results in additional hazards as untreated wastewater from dyes are often discharged into local water systems, releasing heavy metals and other toxicants that can adversely impact the health of animals in addition to nearby residents (Bick et al.).  Beyond the enormous amount of waste that is produced by “fast fashion”, it also encourages the need for cheap efficient labor, which usually comes with the cost of human rights. Textile mills are associated with many occupational hazards and low wages (Harris et al). The true price of clothing is not paid by the consumer. Additionally, items that are considered fast fashion, are not intended to be worn for years so they tatter and fray quickly. This means that their short lifespan lands them in the landfill after only a few years of wear. At every point in the garments lifespan there are improvements that can be made to make it more sustainable.

Solutions!

Buy ethically made clothing! Consumers can have a considerable impact in improving clothing sustainability. Look for items that are made with organic cotton or are certified fair trade! When you buy organic and fair trade you are not only encouraging environmentally friendly companies you are also being a supporter of humane working conditions. One drawback is that shopping ethically and sustainably can be very expensive many people lack the knowledge about the companies they are buying goods from.  However, shopping at thrift stores and other secondhand shops can be a great way to find a fresh look without fueling consumerism and unethical business practices. Another solution can be as simple as shopping less and cutting back on consumption in general.  There is disillusionment when seeking happiness through consumption, so why not buy ethically and find fulfilment in voting with your dollar for a better world!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bick, R., Halsey, E., & Ekenga, C. C. (2018). The global environmental injustice of fast fashion. Environmental Health17(1). doi: 10.1186/s12940-018-0433-7

 

Harris, F., Roby, H., & Dibb, S. (2016). Sustainable clothing: challenges, barriers and interventions for encouraging more sustainable consumer behaviour. International Journal of Consumer Studies40. doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12257

 

 

Raworth, K. (2013). Defining a Safe and Just Space for Humanity. State of the World 2013, 28–38. doi: 10.5822/978-1-61091-458-1_3