Conventional Versus Organic Farming Versus Conventional Farming : Which Impacts the Environment More?

Organically grown foods are often touted as being superior to conventionally grown foods in nearly every aspect.  They are popularly considered to be better for your health and to practice more sustainable growing methods that are healthier for the environment than conventional farming methods.  Organic farmers use naturally based fertilizers and pesticides to grow crops, replacing synthetic ones that may be more toxic to the environment and to humans.  Weeds are also controlled naturally through methods such as crop rotation instead of using herbicides.

However, agriculture consists of a series of trade-offs, and all parts of a farm are interconnected.  Fertilizers and pesticides are used by conventional farms to insure that each parcel of land is used to its maximum potential.  Conventional farms are extremely efficient with land use, growing the most crops with the smallest input of other resources possible.  This decreases the resources required per kilogram of product to grow crops because less water, land, and fertilizer are used to feed weeds and pests.  Organic farms, however, must compensate for not using synthetic fertilizers and pesticides by using larger tracts of land and larger amounts of natural fertilizers.  By over fertilizing, pollutants may run into water systems, leading to algal blooms.  Dedicating additional land to farming destroys the ecosystems and habitats that organic farming methods are supposed to protect.

It is also important to note that although organic food producers use fewer and less ecotoxic pesticides, they still use naturally derived ones.  Without any pesticides, crop yields would decrease drastically.  Naturally derived pesticides are thought to be less harmful to humans, but some have been found to be dangerous.

Organic and conventional farming methods have essentially similar impacts on the environment.  The additional synthetic herbicides and pesticides used by conventional farms are balanced by additional land and fertilizer use by organic farms.  If one is looking to buy eco-friendly farm products, one must work harder than simply buying organically grown produce.  In some areas, such as India and China, lack of technology and regulation means that organically grown methods have an ecological edge over conventional methods.  However, in the US and Europe, the increasing use of genetically modified organisms further reduces the need for synthetic chemicals when growing conventional food and may be more ecologically friendly.  We will all have to do our part in researching environmentally friendly food sources if we want to make a difference.

Hayden Braun

Sources:

https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2016/07/25/organic-vs-conventional-farming-lower-environmental-impact/

Organic Foods: What is Organic Food and What are the Benefits?

https://www.sare.org/Learning-Center/Bulletins/Transitioning-to-Organic-Production/Text-Version/What-is-Organic-Farming

The Cost of Minimalism

What is Minimalism?

Minimalism, as a lifestyle trend, is a relatively new lifestyle trend which gained its popularity mostly via the documentary by Ryan Nicodemus and Joshua Fields Millburn, titled appropriately, “Minimalism: A Documentary About the Important Things.”

According to Ryan and Joshua, minimalism is “a lifestyle that helps people question what things add value to their lives” (Nicodemus). In many ways, it is a response to the unchecked consumerism prevalent in today’s society. Many of us, especially in developed nations like the US, have way too-big houses with way-too many, low-quality things in them. The minimalist approach asks people to question these objects and things in their lives and consider whether they bring value or happiness.

But why question this?

It’s as simple as two words: opportunity cost. The objects we own incur an opportunity cost of both money and time because using and maintain them takes money and time that could be used to do or buy something else (Jonathan Vieker).

The Trend of #Minimalism

Minimalism has become somewhat of a trendy “fad” now. People love posting on various social medias, bragging about the amount of stuff they *don’t* own. Some people even go to the extremes-giving up their personal homes, college diplomas, and any other possessions which can’t all fit in one stylish Scandinavian backpack. Many also buy into it because it is a more sustainable lifestyle. Having less things and investing in handmade, naturally sourced products reduces the environmental impact of your life. From tiny houses to white walls with one piece of furniture, minimalism has become a house decor trend too. It’s all about the aesthetic.

The Minimalist Aesthetic

The items minimalisms do spend their money on and decide add value to their lives are often handmade, made out of raw materials, and aggressively simplistic (Chayka).

The Downside to Minimalism

Here’s the truth: the only people who can practice minimalism are people who can afford it 

Wealth allows for risk taking, and living as a strict minimalist is definitely a risk. As Chelsea Fagan puts it in her article, “Minimalism: another boring product wealthy people can buy”, minimalism “allows you to take on some of the desirable aspects and morality of poverty without ever having to be poor.” If you are already living in a sparse home, you cannot afford to declutter. When you’re just trying to meet your basic needs, you are not considering what things add happiness or value to your life; you are considering what things keep your life going. When you have money, you can afford to have less and to make the objects you do have more aesthetically pleasing. It takes a lot to be a minimalist: social capital, a safety net, and access to the internet (Chayka).

“These people are still conspicuously consuming in mind-boggling ways, they’re just filtering it through the convenient prism of simplicity, and that allows their million-dollar wardrobes to somehow be aspirational” (Fagan)

Looking at your life and questioning whether the items you own add value and happiness to your life is not inherently a bad thing. In fact, questioning in life is extremely important. Buying more ethical, aesthetically pleasing items is not inherently bad either. Being a #minimalist can actually be a good thing. But as a society, we must recognize the limitations and inequalities to the minimalism trend instead of perpetuating unrealistic ideals.

-Nataley Williams

References:

Chayka, K. (2016, July 26). The Oppressive Gospel of ‘Minimalism’. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/31/magazine/the-oppressive-gospel-of-minimalism.html

Fagan, C. (2017, March 04). Minimalism: Another boring product wealthy people can buy. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2017/mar/04/minimalism-conspicuous-consumption-class

Jonathan Vieker, ViekerMusician, J., Edgar, J., R., Shaw, J., Bolle, M., . . . D. (2018, August 17). The Problem with Minimalism. Retrieved from https://jonathanvieker.com/problem-with-minimalism/

Nicodemus, R. (2015, July 12). Minimalism: An Elevator Pitch. Retrieved from https://www.theminimalists.com/pitch/

 

 

Is Global Warming Causing More Cases of the West Nile Virus?

West Nile virus is a mosquito-transmitted disease. Most people infected with the West Nile virus rarely develop any signs or symptoms. However, in some cases, this virus can create life threating illnesses such as brain or spinal cord damage. Mild symptoms tend to go away; however, severe symptoms such as sudden weaknesses or severe headaches require immediate attention.[1] The West Nile Virus occurs during mosquito season which is typical during the summer and early fall. Many people in the United States have been affected by the West Nile virus, yet there are no vaccines to prevent or medication to treat this disease. Studies have shown that 1 out of 5 people who are infected develop fever and other symptoms. However, 1 out of 150 infected people develops a serious illness. About 1 out of 10 people who develop severe illness affecting the central nervous system die.[2] If you are infected with this disease there is an extremely small chance that you will experience symptoms. If you are older and have certain diseases such as hypertension, cancer, and kidney disease it can increase your risk of getting the West Nile virus.[3] However, recent studies have shown that global warming can contribute to more cases of the West Nile virus.

 

 

Mosquito-borne diseases have been on the rise due to global warming. The higher temperatures, humidity, and rainfall linked to climate change have increased outbreaks of the West Nile Virus. A survey has connected the West Nile Virus to warming weather patterns and increasing rainfall. With global warming temperature and rainfall are projected to increase. With the temperature and precipitations being the determinant factor for the West Nile Virus, the changes will increase the disease in the future. According to a study conducted by the Harvard School of Public Health, they have found that the warmer temperatures had the greatest effect on humans contracting the disease. Higher humidity, temperature, and rainfall are all tied up with the increased rate of the West Nile Virus. Warmer weather helps spread the West Nile Virus because it allows the mosquitos to live longer and also increase the length of the mosquito season. Higher temperature also let mosquitos reach biting age sooner which will speed up the spread of the virus. Not only will there be more mosquitos carrying the West Nile Virus but they will also carry more copies of the West Nile virus making them more likely to infect humans. Another study has shown that a single rainstorm of only two inches could increase infection by 33 percent. The increase of rainfall can increase humidity which will stimulate mosquitoes to bite. An increase of 0.75 inches of rainfall raises the number of infections by five percent. With global warming worsening as the years go on it is important to take precaution and always apply repellent when you are heading outdoors.[4]

 

 

 

Due to the fact that there is a rare chance of developing severe symptoms many do not take this virus seriously. As of September 2018, in Greenville County, a resident was confirmed dead due to the West Nile Virus. The Department of Health and Environmental Control has confirmed seven human cases of West Nile in the upstate. At least five areas in South Carolina have reported being affected which include Greenville country, Boiling Springs, Greenwood, and Columbia. [5] It is important as a community to help promote the use of insect repellent and encourage others to wear long-sleeved shirts and long pants when outdoors to prevent the risk of developing the virus. The symptoms of developing a serious illness are very slim but it is always better to be safe than sorry.

-Tiffany Mendez

[1] “West Nile Virus,” Mayo Clinic, January 03, 2018,

[2]“West Nile Virus,” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, August 02, 2017

[3] West Nile Virus,” Mayo Clinic, January 03, 2018,

 

[4] Gammon, “Global Warming May Lead to More West Nile Virus,” Scientific American, March 20, 2009

[5] Emily Bohatch, “SC Sees First West Nile Virus Death in 2018,” Thestate.com

References:

Bohatch, Emily. “SC Sees First West Nile Virus Death in 2018.” Thestate. Accessed September 28, 2018. https://www.thestate.com/news/state/south-carolina/article218185280.html.

Gammon. “Global Warming May Lead to More West Nile Virus.” Scientific American. March 20, 2009. Accessed September 28, 2018. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/west-nile-virus-global-warming/.

“West Nile Virus.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. August 02, 2017. Accessed September 28, 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/westnile/symptoms/index.html.

“West Nile Virus.” Mayo Clinic. January 03, 2018. Accessed September 28, 2018. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/west-nile-virus/symptoms-causes/syc-20350320.

Pictures:https://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2018/08/officials_confirm_first_human_case_of_west_nile_vi.html

https://grist.org/climate-energy/wanna-get-west-nile-virus-climate-change-will-help/

https://www.123rf.com/photo_16608092_west-nile-virus-word-cloud-mosquito-standing-water-graphic-illustration-isolated-on-white-background.html

 

 

Paper Usage of Musicians

Image result for piles of sheet music

 

Over the past week, the Furman Greenbelt began a project called the Lifestyle Project. We have each been challenged to select three categories in which to be aware of our behaviors and habits in relation to sustainability. For example, my three chosen categories are reducing my water and electricity usage by half, eating vegetarian a few days a week, and to produce no waste that would end up in a landfill. As I have worked on these 3 categories (though I have slipped up several times), I have become much more aware of my everyday habits in and outside of my selected categories. I have found myself thinking about sustainability throughout the day and asking myself questions about the consequences my actions have on the environment and our resources. As a former music major and a student still heavily involved in the music department, I have found myself thinking a lot about the high percentages of paper usage in the music world due to sheet music, drill sheets in the marching band, etc. 

     Due to strict copyright laws on musical scores, I often find myself having to purchase an entire book of music just to be able to access a single piece. As we are learning new pieces of music, we typically have to make copies to give to our lesson teachers and accompanists. In large ensembles, single pieces or books of music must be purchased in large numbers or copied in large numbers so that everyone in the ensemble has music. In addition to the large amounts of paper it takes to make musical scores, students and faculty typically make sheet music orders online, which means we also use up resources in packaging and shipping. 

      Not only do we go through lots of paper learning our music, we also use a lot in advertising for performances. Despite how much advertising is done online these days through email, social media, etc., it is typical to see lots of paper flyers hanging in various places on campus and around town. When attending performances, audience members receive paper tickets and paper programs. These examples are just a few out of many instances in which lots of paper is used in the music world both in and outside of Furman. 

      So what can we do?! One year ago, Florida State University’s marching band implemented a program in which the 400 or so band members learn their marching drills through an app on their smart phones instead of sheets of paper. Before this new system, they were said to use around 200,000 sheets of paper each year. Learning drills through the app on their phones is estimated to save save eighty five to ninety percent of their paper usage. Another way to reduce paper usage for musicians is through iPads. Many musicians are beginning to purchase iPads in which they can upload all their music and place on their stands instead of paper music. This not only saves paper, but money as well. Most pieces of music can be found or purchased in PDF format online and downloaded directly into your app of choice for reading music. The use of the iPad saves money, paper, and is much easier to transport than regular sheet music. While there are more ways to cut down on paper usage in music to be discovered, these two are a great start. In the future, I hope that musicians around Furman will begin to consider the amount of paper they use on a daily basis and challenge themselves to find ways to reduce it.

-Katie Crockford

Sources:

https://www.si.com/college-football/2017/09/27/florida-state-marching-band-paperless-music-green

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/08/musicians-embrace-the-ipad-leave-sheet-music-at-home/243726/

Sustainability and Your Menstrual Cycle

How women have been tackling their menstrual cycles since the beginning of humanity has evolved incredibly. Starting with separation from society in many cultures during Biblical times, to bleeding onto rags or right on their clothes in Medieval times, and then to the development of the pad (1). During the 18th century the Hoosier Belt came into circulation, for sanitary reasons, with a attachable, washable pad. Disposable pads were not on the market until the 1920s when nurses during the war discovered that medical bandages also worked well with absorbing period blood (1). Up until the 1980s, when the Hoosier Belt was no longer in fashion, disposable menstrual products were leaking less, becoming more comfortable, and more popular (1). The alterations in period products gave women more freedom and comfort with a natural bodily function almost all women go through. With the rising concern of waste and sustainable development, menstrual products have been going through another recreation. These new innovations reduce the amount of waste produced during the week of a woman’s menstrual cycle while also giving her more freedom and something to feel good about. Some of the more sustainable options were created years ago but have been improved to fit women’s standards today.

On average, a woman will throw away between 10,000-15,000 pads and tampons in her life, which equates to 300 lbs of waste (4). One of the many environmental impacts attributed to the use of disposable feminine hygiene products, that many people overlook, is how they are created and what they are made of. For instance, a common chemical in plastic tampon applicators and the underside of stick-on pads is low-density polyethylene. This particular chemical requires a large amount of fossil fuel powered energy to create and results in a carbon footprint of 5.3 kg of CO2 (2). Now imagine that number but with all women around the world that have access to these products and the number of tampons and pads they will use in their lifetimes. In addition, it takes about 500-800 years for disposable feminine products to decompose (3), thus continually filling landfills. This is not sustainable because the life of the product after use is much longer than the woman who used it and that was only one napkin. Also, there are still many people who lack access to menstrual products and for period products to be sustainable they need to be inclusive and meet everyone’s needs no matter where they are. There are many companies who offer sustainable alternatives who also contribute to the fight of helping females in impoverished countries get access to products by donating their profits. Just another reason to buy them!

It may seem necessary to use disposable feminine products because that is what is advertised and primarily sold in stores, but it does not have to be that way. There are many comfortable alternatives to the menstrual products women are accustomed to today. There are menstrual cups, reusable pads and tampons, period underwear, sponges, and more sustainable, yet conventional products out there, like organic cotton pads and tampons. These products create less waste in landfills and are not created from chemicals harmful to the environment and to you. There is not that much information about menstruation due to the stigma that surrounds it, which hinders creative, sustainable innovations. in addition, many of the companies that oversee creating new period products for women do not want to pursue the sustainable route because it will decrease their sales and the dependence of women on their companies. The stigma and company power needs to change so that women can approach a natural occurrence in a more sustainable way that will also enhance future generations of females to have more power over their bodies and the impacts they have on their surrounding environment.

Here are the links to some sustainable menstrual products that supplies reviews, options, their missions, and why to make the switch.

 

Sources:

  1. https://www.medicaldaily.com/menstrual-period-time-month-history-387252
  2. https://rctom.hbs.org/submission/the-ecological-impact-of-feminine-hygiene-products/
  3. https://medium.com/one-future/sustainable-menstruation-the-environmental-impact-of-menstrual-products-eba30e095cda
  4. https://www.bustle.com/articles/129938-6-ways-to-be-environmentally-conscious-during-your-period
  • Emilia Hyland

Student Paper Use

How many pages do you print each day? While just spending a few moments in the library I see several printers each being used one person who looks like a senior is printing an entire text book he borrowed by a friend. An RA prints hall activities and posters for their hall and the rest of the printers are being used by students print their papers that are most likely due in a few hours or minutes. Although I know that everyone likes that warm feeling of freshly printed paper in their hands but just how detrimental is that to the environment and how much does a Furman student print in a semester? And how is paper recycled? These statistics took a long time of planning and a study that lasted four years.

In the year 2000 26,935 tons of paper were sold in the United States alone (2000, U.S. Statistics Bureau), for reference a ton of paper has about 200,000 sheets of computer paper which is comprised of 400 reams of paper, one tree is 16.7 reams While the process for recycling paper is better than throwing out your paper you received an F on, it’s still a process and does use harmful chemicals and ink to repaint paper into its final form. Also, another issue with recycling paper is that paper can only be recycled a number of times. The strongest paper is that which books are drafted from since a book will be read multiple times while a newspaper may only be read once. As with all recycled materials they can only be recycled down the strength scale. A recycled book will never be a book again and may turn into a newspaper eventually that paper will reach the end of its life and will be unrecyclable.

The study conducted by Shannon Bartholomew and Weston Dripps looked at paper consumption before and after a paper limit was set on Furman students. The study recorded the total printed pages of an average student by class year over an expanse of four years. The program also recorded major, sex and type of document that was printed. Princeton University conducted a similar study and concluded that their students printed a total of 11,040,362 sheets of paper over the course of two semesters. Shown below is the breakdown of how much that actually is.

University Princeton Furman
Total 11,040362 4,400,000
Total per semester 11,040,362/2 = 55,20,181 sheets 4,400,000 /2 = 2,200,000
Total Graduate 2,845  
Total Under Graduate 5,260 2,800
     

Keeping these numbers in mind we have to account for the fact that Princeton is an R1 University, meaning there are quite a few graduate students and that the undergrad population is twice the size of Furman. Before reviewing this study, I had no idea how much paper was actually being printed on campus. I wanted to research this based off of the amount of paper left in the printers and I wanted to see undergraduates printing habits.

  • Spencer Jones

Did Global Warming cause Hurricane Florence?

With all this commotion surrounding Hurricane Florence many wonder what the correlation is between hurricanes and global warming.There has been a lot of claims that global warming is the cause of the excessive amounts of hurricanes that have been forming throughout the past few years. While global warming is a reason for the excess amount of rain fall and flooding, scientists say that global warming does not actually cause the hurricanes. However, it does make the hurricanes more destructive and powerful.

Global warming is defined as an increase in the overall temperature of the atmosphere. The rise of atmospheric temperature is said to be caused by the greenhouse effect which is caused by increased amounts of CO2 and other greenhouse gases being produced and emitted. Although temperature change is expected, the rate at which it is rising is alarming because it is changing at a pace that is to fast for some living things to adapt too according to National Geographic. In addition to this, global warming can also cause the oceans to heat which can cause certain natural disasters to become more drastic and dangerous such as tropical cyclones and hurricanes.

North Carolina State research meteorologist, Dr. Carl Schreck states that over 30 other hurricanes have passed through the same axis point as Hurricane Florence has but of those 30 plus hurricanes, Hurricane Florence is the only one to make landfall. Schreck states that because of the shift of winds in the atmosphere, Hurricane Florence has shifted more towards North Carolina instead of staying in the Atlantic ocean like other Hurricanes that have gone through that axis point.  According to National Geographic, the rain fall from Hurricane florence is expected to be over 50% worse than it would have been if global warming did not exist. The reasoning behind this is because the higher temperatures of the ocean and the higher atmospheric temperatures . To further back the evidence that global warming is a cause for worse hurricanes, the Chicago Tribune states that scientists have found “for every degree the air warms, it can hold nearly 4 percent more water and offer measurably more energy to goose the storm.” Global warming can also cause hurricanes to move slower and stall, causing large floods as seen most recently in Myrtle Beach and other coastal cities.

Even though we cannot stop climate change completely there are many ways that we can slow down the rise in climate. One way to do so is by powering your homes and other buildings with renewable energy. By using solar power or other renewable energy sources you can cut your energy use and greenhouse gas emissions down significantly which can help slow down the rise of atmospheric temperature.

 

-Kendall Perez

sources:

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/2018/09/hurricane-florence-rain-climate-change-science/

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-climate-change-hurricanes-20180914-story.html

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/global-warming/global-warming-overview/

 

pictures:

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/2018/09/hurricane-florence-rain-climate-change-science/

https://www.axios.com/hurricane-florence-worst-case-scenario-carolina-coast-e25afc3d-cb78-4ff6-ac0e-43110590dce9.html

Chemistry Behind Ocean Acidification

70% of the surface of the Earth is covered with water and 80% of life on earth lies under the water. Many of us forget how immense the Ocean is. Its capacity is hidden from us still remaining in mystery. With containing the vast biodiversity, one of its role is to chemically balance the pH of the entire earth. The enormous body of water acts as a buffer. A buffer can resist sudden changes of pH whether the atmosphere is too basic or too acidic.

Day to day, Earth is maintaining a constant equilibrium with Carbon Dioxide (CO2). Depending on the amount of the CO2 the Ocean either absorbs or releases CO2. While CO2 still remains as a key substance which flourishes all the greens on earth (photosynthesis), the earth came to a point where the level of CO2 is threatening the beautiful life under the water.

So how actually does CO2 acidify the Ocean? The Atmospheric CO2 dissolves into the water. When it meets the water it becomes a Carbonic acid (H2CO3). Since the carbonic acid is a weak acid with 6.4 pKa(whereas one of the strongest acid; Hydrochloric acid’s pKa is just about -10), it constantly tries to be in an equilibrium from H2CO3 to Biocarbonate ions (HCO3) and Hydronium ions (H3O+). However, increased concentration of Hydronium ions lowers the pH. The ocean naturally has a base, a carbonate ion (CO32-),that can bind with the hydronium ions to restore the normal pH. When natural concentration of  CO32- in the sea gets depleted, organisms like shellfish and corals that build their structure with Calcium ion (Ca+) and Carbonate ion (CO32-) gives up their minerals to balance the acidity. Then they become “bleached out” due to the escape of CO32-  in the organism’s structure.

Losing the corals means destroying billions of fish’s habitat and their source of food. The more acidic the ocean becomes the more organisms will melt into the sea to stop the acidification. Why should they be the ones melting away because of our convenience and ignorance? When we become more aware of our better daily choices to the environment and more uncomfortable about our selfish habits, the chance of saving the biodiversity increases. Reducing unnecessary consumption of red meat, voting for political parties actively involved in sustainability, choosing green energy, and simply just using and spending less will remarkably decrease the CO2 emission.

Dahye Kim

https://seagrant.unh.edu/news/ocean-acidification-gulf-maine-nhsgs-response-emerging-environmental-concern http://www.riclimatechange.org/changes_ocean_acidification.php

https://bravenewclimate.com/2008/08/29/top-10-ways-to-reduce-your-co2-emissions-footprint/

The Pop Bomb

 

“While you are reading these words four people, most likely children, will die of starvation—and twenty-four more babies will have been born”

 

 

 

In the 1960s, a new kind of fear began to spread across America. The idea that the rapid growth of population will eventually deem Earth inhabitable to mankind was powerful and controversial. It struck fear in a massive audience leading to radical proposals, discrimination against large families, and a disposition of doom that fell over largely populated areas. This alarming reality check was delivered to the world by one scientist: Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich.

Ehrlich was originally a biologist at Stanford who specialized in the study of butterflies. After one trip to the overcrowded streets of Delhi, his focus immediately changed from insects to the infestation of a much more complex species: mankind. His concern was straightforward: “We live in a finite planet with finite resources. With such a system, you can’t have infinite population growth.” (2015 Interview population bomb documentary).

Dr. Ehrlich became the grim reaper of human existence. In 1968, the biologist came out with “The Population Bomb”. Millions purchased the book and were shocked by Ehrlich’s apocalyptic prophesies. He warned that hundreds of millions of people would starve to death by the 1970’s, that 65 million of them would be Americans, that overcrowded India was doomed beyond repair, and that “England will not exist in the year 2000”. In 1970, he predicted that the end of mankind was right around the corner.

 

“Sometime in the next 15 years, the end will come. By ‘end’, I mean an utter breakdown of the capacity of the planet to support humanity.”

 

 

Ehrlich’s warnings and proposed methods of worldwide birth control kick started an international trend of fear-fueled protests and demonstrations, defending both sides of the controversial argument. One in particular was headed by a former student of Ehrlich, who demonstrated what post carrying-capacity America might look like by leading a public starvation demonstration.

The biologist’s calls for immediate action led to the formation of the Zero Population Growth organization. During his appearance on the Tonight Show, Dr. Ehrlich explained the philosophy behind ZPG: “We have to get the death rate and birth rate in balance and there’s only one of two ways to do it: one is to bring the birth rate down, the other is to push the death rate up”. Support for ZPG spread throughout America as the number of members went from six hundred to six hundred thousand. Commercials and newspaper articles encouraged married couples to limit themselves to two children, creating a negative stigma for families that exceeded this number. Ehrlich’s proposals for reducing the birth rate were radical, but to him, necessary. He advocated using force if voluntary methods failed along with:  a “responsibility prize” for childless marriages, taxes on children, luxury taxes on diapers and cribs, and additive chemicals in public water that would decrease fertility.

 

 

Women protesting the sterilization of mothers: Racial discrimination became a factor in the controversy when colored families were targeted by ZPG advocates to limit their families. 

 

 

 

Student of Paul Ehrlich, leader of a demonstration that involved 60 people starving in public: “There’s too many people and we would like to see people have fewer children and better ones…

 Anyone who’s thinking of having a third child should try going hungry for a week”

 

 

Underdeveloped countries, which are more vulnerable to the environmental consequences of overpopulation, had already started implementing birth control methods. In the mid 1970s, the Indian government went to unethical extremes to encourage mass sterilization. Some communities were bribed into sterilization with food aid and free health care, while others were sterilized by force. A 1970s American News Station reported that over 8 million sterilizations had been performed in India, many by force. The anchorman described the inhumane treatment of the women, equating it to the treatment of cattle. Another station described the scene as a

deadly assembly line where “83 women were operated upon in a span of just six hours by a single doctor.” Protests flooded the streets of India, which authorities responded to with firearms. Over fifty protesters were shot down and killed during one demonstration.

 

 

 

 

So what ever came of the feared population bomb?

As we can see by the overabundance of food in America and the existence of England and India, Ehrlich’s drastic claims did not become reality. He predicted that by the 1970s, India would be starving. The case was quite the opposite. The Green Revolution, which peaked in the 1970s and 80s, created an agricultural boom by introducing new farming techniques and technology. The population growth may have been booming, but the economic explosion left an impact that was even more powerful than Ehrlich’s warnings: optimism.

A common criticism of Dr. Ehrlich’s theories is that humans are conscious, problem-solving beings. When we see a factor that has the potential to threaten our existence, we implement regulations and awareness. An example of this would be the Clean Air and Water acts in America. We have the unique ability to change our destiny.

Many parts of the world are even dealing with the flip-side of the population bomb: a “baby bust”. Counties in Asia and Europe are calling for another baby boom to manage issues related to the aging population and a lack of women in certain parts of the world.

Although the majority of his ominous predictions did not come true, Paul Ehrlich was successful in bringing a pending issue to surface and spreading awareness. Although the national policy in India has changed and no longer requires sterilization, the country has seen a voluntary decrease in family size. The population bomb was defused by urbanization, the Green Revolution, and efforts towards food distribution. In a 2014 interview, Ehrlich admits that there are things in the past the he would not have written today. But his core message and beliefs remain unfazed by the fortunate turn of events in the world.

Adopting his infamous tone of doom, Ehrlich explains that there are currently more than 4.5 billion people in the world, and they are consuming more resources than ever before.

“I do not think my language is too apocalyptic in “Population Bomb”. My language would be even more apocalyptic today. The idea that every woman should have as many babies as she wants is, to me, exactly the same kind of idea as everybody being permitted to throw as much garbage into their neighbors’ backyard as they want.”

As the world continues to see a growth in people and the consequential depletion of the environment, Ehlrich’s ominous warnings still echo in the hearts of humanity.

“Too many cars, too many factories, too much detergent, too much pesticides, multiplying contrails, inadequate sewage treatment plants, too little water, too much carbon dioxide – all can be traced easily to too many people”

-Ellie Hunt

 

News report picture: https://static01.nyt.com/images/2015/06/01/blogs/dotpopcronkite/dotpopcronkite-facebookJumbo.jpg

Population bomb documentary: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8XOF3SOu8I

Article: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/01/us/the-unrealized-horrors-of-population-explosion.html

Ehrlich 2014 portrait: https://swh-826d.kxcdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Paul-R-Ehrlich.jpg

Plan your family poster: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/nov/12/india-sterilisation-deaths-women-forced-camps-relatives

India sterilization: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/nov/12/india-sterilisation-deaths-women-forced-camps-relatives

Honey Bee Cabin

Much has been said regarding the current status of the honey bee in America today.  It seems like every other week we receive a new report on the wellbeing of hives across the country.  Half of these mention that bees are heading straight toward extinction and the other half claim bees are making a dramatic comeback.  While both of these do contain some truthful parts, being that bees were once heading towards extinction but have since made a mild comeback, both statements are not entirely truthful.  In reality, honey bee numbers across America have started to rise for the first time in a ten-year drought yet we still see a massive decrease in functioning hives each year.

Colony-collapse disorder is the term given to bee hives suddenly and rapidly deteriorating, killing all the bees and destroying the hive.  Colony-collapse has many causes but almost always occurs in the winter, when the bee population of the hive drops to its lowest.  It is when the population is the smallest that factors like neonicotinoid pesticides and varroa mites can take down a whole hive.  We have known about this main cause for quite some time, and much has been done to reduce the prevalence of these toxins.  For instance, many states have banned the use of neonicotinoids as a pesticide to protect pollinators, and the EPA is already working on a federal ban right now.

However, the varroa mite is a different story; it is not some compound that the government can ban. The varroa mite is common brown beetle roughly the size of a nail head, found in nearly every country of the world except for Australia and other isolated countries.  Varroa mites begin their lifecycle as tiny eggs laid inside the comb of a hive.  Here, the mites will wait for the queen bee to lay an egg in their cell.  Once the honey bee pupa, hatches so does the mite.  The mite then attaches to the baby bee feeding off its blood while the bee consumes the honey and nectar in its cell.  The mite will remain attached to the bee for the rest of its life, feeding off its blood, eventually killing it.  Then it finds another bee to attach to. There are many common methods of removing varroa mites, from putting in varroa strips which contains a chemical deadly to the mites to even dusting the whole hive in powered sugar to prevent the mites from hanging on to the bees.  Unfortunately, almost every method used was not effective enough to prevent collapse.  Until now…

Researchers at The Hebrew University of Jerusalem have accidentally discovered that after feeding their bees tiny doses of Lithium Chloride nearly every varroa mite died.  The concentration of lithium chloride is low enough to spare the bee, but the mites are killed off nearly as fast as the compound is applied.  If further testing yields the same results as found, this could be essential in the quest to save the bees.  Leaving only the regulation of noenicitinoids as a factor for extinction.   In the end, much has been accomplished to prevent extinction, including policy changes, neonicotinoid bans, and new varroa treatments; however there is still a lot to be done to save our fuzzy friends.

-Tyler Carlson