The Furman Farm: a Champion for Biodiversity on Campus

Calla Pederson

The cabin reaped the benefits of last fall’s harvest on the Furman Farm: from pesto, to salads, to tacos, to roasted veggie sides, the fresh, organic produce was a luxury.  Oftentimes, organic foods are seen as too pricey, unnecessary, or a marketing ploy. While words suggesting the food is “natural” are often used to enthrall the consumer, I can attest to the higher quality of organic produce, as can the surrounding environment.

Kale from the garden!
Pesto made with Furman Farm basil
Tacos featuring lettuce from the farm

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Some background – I am a biology major currently taking my research/writing intensive class. For class, we have to pick a research topic, and mine currently has to do with how more sustainable agricultural practices contribute to biodiversity of the ecosystem of which the farm is a part. Loss of species is happening at an accelerated rate. Since all life on Earth is connected in some way or another, this affects everything in some way, including humans. For example, the increasing extinction rates in biologically diverse ecosystems, such as rainforests, lead to increasing costs to maintain agricultural production, clean air and water, and even human health (libretexts). Although modern society and technology have given the illusion that humans are removed from ecosystems and nature, we still rely on plants for everything – food, medicine, clothes, clean air, and clean water – just to name a few.

Organic farming supports biodiversity and environmental health literally from the ground up. The lack of pesticide, herbicide, and fungicide use all support the life of microorganisms and other important species, like insects, that call the soil home. These species contribute to the nutrient content of the soil, via waste. Microorganisms help decompose organic matter, releasing excess nutrients into the system for use by plants (“Soil Biological Fertility”). Many organic farms allow underlying vegetation to grow, which creates habitats for wildlife (Myers et al., 2019). This contributes to biodiversity on a larger scale. Organic practices also help keep water clean by eliminating use of toxic chemicals (“Environmental Benefits of Organic”). Organic farming even actively fights climate change by sequestering carbon (“Environmental  Benefits of Organic”)! As organic carbon matter decomposes, it gets converted to carbon dioxide through respiration, but practices commonly found on organic farms, like conservation tillage, cover cropping, and crop rotation, increase the amount of carbon (organic matter) stored in the soil (**sourced from my mom who works for NRCS).

Vegetation left relatively undisturbed to create habitats and contribute to soil health!

Composting, which is integral to organic farms’ practices like Furman’s, has a plethora of environmental benefits – biodiversity among them. Microorganisms love compost and quicken its decay (“The Top Benefits of Composting”). These microorganisms also assist in aerating the soil, which helps ensure that micronutrients are readily available in their most usable state (“The Top Benefits of Composting”). Composting benefits all aspects of farming, as composted soil is nutrient rich and aids in plant growth, and the soil attracts microorganisms and insects, which further enrich the soil and boost plant growth.

Site for collection of residential compost on the farm
Homogenized compost at the Furman Farm
More decomposing organic matter!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Research suggests that organic farming practices support biodiversity. Tuck et al. found that species richness on organic farms is, on average, 34% richer than on conventional farms. They also found that plants and microbes are among the taxonomic groups that benefit the most from organic farming practices, which makes sense, considering all we have learned about composting and other organic practices (Tuck et al., 2014). The findings from this study suggest that the benefits of organic farming are “robust across sampling sizes” (Tuck et al., 2014). Despite the fact that the Furman Farm is a small one, its positive environmental impacts are substantial. However, they also found that biodiversity increased as the percentage of the landscape consisting of arable land (farmland) increased, so larger organic farms have a greater impact on biodiversity (Tuck et al., 2014). Another study used acoustic indices to compare the abundance and diversity of birds on organic versus conventional farms. Bird-prevalence was used as a marker of biodiversity, and the study found that organic farms had much more diverse sounds and a greater abundance of sounds stemming from animals and other life, which are key to biodiversity (Myers et al., 2019).

One still heavily-contested drawback of organic farming is that it produces significantly smaller yields than conventional agriculture, which is key to feeding the world, especially one with such a rapidly growing population. However, one alternative suggested by Tuck et al. is to combine organic practices with conventional agriculture, or even just have a small portion of a conventional farm operated organically in order to support wildlife and biodiversity more in the area. This issue definitely isn’t going away any time soon, so it is increasingly important that humans develop new (or return to old!) agricultural practices as the population and climate develops and changes.

Work Cited:

“Environmental Benefits of Organic.” OTA, ota.com/organic-101/environmental-benefits-organic#:~:text=Instead%20of%20relying%20on%20synthetic,cover%20cropping%2C%20and%20crop%20rotation.

Libretexts. “21.1: Importance of Biodiversity.” Biology LibreTexts, Libretexts, 15 Aug. 2020, bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_and_General_Biology/Book%3A_Concepts_in_Biology_(OpenStax)/21%3A_Conservation_and_Biodiversity/21.1%3A_Importance_of_Biodiversity.

Myers, David, Håkan Berg, and Giorgos Maneas. “Comparing the soundscapes of organic and conventional olive groves: A potential method for bird diversity monitoring.” Ecological indicators 103 (2019): 642-649.

“Soil Biological Fertility.” Soil Biological Fertility | Fact Sheets, www.soilquality.org.au/factsheets/soil-biological-fertility#:~:text=Soil%20microorganisms%20(figure%201)%20are,be%20taken%20up%20by%20plants.

“The Top Benefits of Composting.” BioEnergy Consult, 12 Aug. 2020, www.bioenergyconsult.com/top-benefits-of-composting/.

Tuck, Sean L., et al. “Land‐use intensity and the effects of organic farming on biodiversity: a hierarchical meta‐analysis.” (2014).

 

 

Stuck on you: the Tragic Love Story of Gum and the Environment

By Calla Pederson

If you know me, you know that I’m always found with a mouth full of gum – it’s basically a personality trait at this point, an extension of myself. I feel incredibly lucky that my environmental-scientist parents instilled pretty sustainable habits within me, so when I decided to go landfill-waste-free for a few days, the only thing I really had to cut out was my gum-chomping habit. Recently, I saw a video on TikTok (by @chessi) about gum’s adverse environmental and health effects, which I had never considered and inspired me to look further into this routine of mine.

Live footage of me (iykyk)

Chewing gum is the second most littered item on Earth, second only to cigarette butts! Chewing gum has long been a practice of humans, but Indigenous peoples chewed tree resin. The first manufactured gum was chicle-based. Chicle is tree sap from the Sapodilla tree.

The Sapodilla Tree, from which chicle is sourced

Later, after gaining widespread popularity in the United States, the synthetic polymer polyisobutene replaced the more sustainable option. Other “gum bases” (aka plastics) include petroleum, polyethylene, butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), or polyvinyl acetate and are linked to cancer and autoimmune disorders. It was found that high doses of the preservative BHT in animals causes cancer, but the FDA considers minimal doses safe. Titanium dioxide is used to whiten and smooth products, and in high doses, caused organ and nervous system damage in rats. Goodyear, yes that Goodyear – the tire company – manufactures most gum bases. Chronic gum-chewing is also linked to IBS and jaw issues.

Gum doesn’t fully break down in the highly acidic environment of the stomach, so it definitely doesn’t in the environment around us. People chew (and throw away – or litter) 560,000 tons of gum annually. The good news is there are some gum recycling companies and startups out there, such as UK-based startup Gum Drop and Terracycle in the US and Mexico. They turn gum into pencils, shoe soles, and coffee cups. However, this does mean that the gum must be properly recycled, and it’s already difficult enough to ensure that regular recycling gets… recycled appropriately. Removing littered gum from city streets also costs more than a pretty penny – about $3 per piece!

Long story short, Healthline says gum does no severe damage to your health (you can be the judge of that), but the environment is another story. Another thing I have focused on a lot recently is sustainable habits. Over the past few gumless days, I have noticed I feel more present and conscious of the task at hand, which is strange because I always chewed gum to help myself focus and manage stress and anxiety. I’m not going to lie – the first day was definitely a struggle! If you still can’t kick your gum addiction, opt for natural, chicle-based gum, or better yet, buy all-natural mints in bulk and refill an old Altoids container with them. Time to get gum out of Mother Earth’s hair!Kicking my gum addiction!

Kicking my gum addiction!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Credits: https://www.amazon.com/Sapodilla-Manilkara-zapota-Organic-Tropical/dp/B07CRMWFBM

https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/chewing-gum-good-or-bad#TOC_TITLE_HDR_4https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/this-is-what-your-chewing-gum-habit-is-doing-to-the-environment_uk_5aec2613e4b041fd2d253823https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/science/the-green-lantern-is-chewing-gum-bad-for-the-environment/2011/03/29/AFrVjO1D_story.html