Author: Addison Smith

Addison Smith

In 2015, the United Nations along with 193 nations welcomed the Sustainable Development Goals. Pope Francis, Nobel Peace Laureate Malala, and superstar Shakira came to the UN and pleaded for a world free from poverty, inequality, and climate change. Their emotional speeches and songs struck excitement around the world, as hope emerged from this agreement. By 2030, these goals, to name a few, seek to eliminate poverty and hunger, promote quality education for all, and eradicate the effects of climate change. However, after the agreement was signed, many argued that the goals were too idealistic or too unrealistic; others argued that these goals did not go far enough. We are now five years into the agreement– is the world on track to eradicate poverty, hunger, and climate change by 2030? Does the SDG excitement still exist? The answers to these questions are ambiguous, as the world is on track to accomplish some goals, while extremely behind in attempting to accomplish others. However, holistically, the world is not on track to accomplish the SDGs. We must take decisive action to change our course.

Michael Green, an economist and CEO of Social Progress Imperative, forecasts the world’s progress towards these goals based on economic modeling. According to his predictions, there is only one country in the world that is projected to accomplish all 17 goals—Denmark (The Future). It is worrisome to think that 193 nations signed an agreement, but only one signer is projected to accomplish the outlined goals. According to Green, based on the current track, the world will not accomplish the 17 SDG targets until 2094— that is 64 years after 2030 (The Future). What is the world doing? Did these 193 nations actually expect to accomplish these goals? If so, it clear that the world must change its trajectory.

According to the SDG tracker, the world is progressing in terms of eradicating hunger, providing accessible healthcare, and providing clean water and sanitation. In fact, the world could accomplish ninety percent of these three areas by 2030 (“SDG Tracker”). Green argues that if the world could change its trajectory, these three SDGs could be accomplished completely. However, he makes it clear that the world is not progressing towards the SDGs pertaining to inclusiveness and gender equality. In fact, he says that the world is actually declining. According to the SDG tracker, the percentage of domestic violence has increased worldwide; the discrimination against the LGBTQ+ community has increased, and number of childhood marriages has increased (“SDG Tracker). The SDGs are grounded in the idea that no one is left behind. The world cannot not choose some SDGs to target while neglecting others. If no one is going to be left behind, the world must works towards all of the SDGs.

It is evident that if the world expects to meet its projected goals, or even get close by 2030, the current trajectory must improve. It is time to realign the world’s investment in the SDGs. The large, powerful nations must first set the example. The G7 countries are considered the seven richest nations in the world, and, unfortunately, they are all failing to accomplish the outlined goals. They have the resources to eradicate poverty, inequality, and climate change in their nations, yet they are not investing the necessary time or money to hold up their end of the bargain. How can developing nations be expected to meet the SDGs, when the most economically powerful countries in the world are failing to do so?

Ultimately, the 193 nations that agreed to the SDGs must do better. We must rekindle the excitement and enthusiasm that we had in 2015. We CAN accomplish these goals. We CAN eradicate poverty, hunger, inequality, and climate change. Frankly, time is running out; we HAVE to accomplish these goals. Our world depends it—our livelihood depends on it.

Citations:

“About the SDG Tracker – SDG Tracker.” Our World in Data. N.p., n.d. Web. 01 Mar. 2020.

The Future: The Global Goals We’ve Made Progress On– and the Ones We Haven’t. Perf. Michael Green. TED. TED, Sept. 2018. Web. 01 Mar. 2020.

“Sustainable Development Goals.:. Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform.” United Nations. United Nations, n.d. Web. 01 Mar. 2020.

 

Addison Smith

I find it astounding that according to the World Health Organization, 4.2 million people die every year as a result of unsafe air pollution, and 91% of people live in places where air quality exceeds the World Health’s safety standards. I find it even more astounding that there 5.25 trillion pieces of plastic debris in the ocean. The worst part about these astonishing statistics: they are completely preventable.

We have created a culture of convenience and one time usage; it is killing our world. For example, we use plastic water bottles, plastic straws, and plastic bags one time. First, the production of these items release harmful pollutants in the air that create smog and cause lung disease such as asthma, emphysema, and even cancer. After we use these items, they end up in our rivers, lakes, streams, and oceans, which cause detrimental health effects in humans, animals, and ecosystems.

While our circumstances look quite grim, there are new, promising innovations that are drastically decreasing these harmful air pollutants. For example, Daan Roosegaarde created the Smog Free Tower in 2015. This tower is much like a vacuum cleaner: it takes in unclean air, and through an ionization process, it then releases clean air back into the environment. “It can clean 30,000 cubic meters of air every hour, and it can suck in up to 70% of PM10, which are tiny pollutants that lodge in our lungs,” according to ENS Clean Air. These towers stand around 23 feet tall, and cost $54,000. They are meant to clean small spaces, like public parks and other public spaces. I believe that these vacuum towers are the keys to the future of clean air, as they have been extremely successful in large cities like Beijing and Tianjin. Now, it is time for our government to prioritize clean air and create incentives for businesses and other institutions to invest in these towers.

In the ocean, the situation seems even more grim. However, Ocean Cleanup, an organization dedicated to cleaning our water sources, has created a passive cleaning system. It is considered a passive system because it does not rely on any external forces. In fact, it relies on natural forces such as solar, wind, and current powers. These natural forces along with an anchor collect large amounts of pollutants and concentrate them in one physical location. Then, a vessel goes into the system and removes the trash, much like a typical garbage truck. According to Ocean Cleanup, this system has the capacity to remove up to 50% of the Great Pacific Garbage Patch in just five years!

These innovations are promising, and I am beyond thankful for these wonderful inventors because they very well might save us. However, as consumers, we cannot simply rely on the next innovation to save us. As previously mentioned, we have the capacity to prevent much of our water and air pollutants. It is time to create a culture that prioritizes our world over mere convenience.

Sources:

“Air Pollution.” World Health Organization, World Health Organization, 24 Sept. 2019, www.who.int/airpollution/en/.

“New Positive Results for the Smog Free Tower.” ENS Clean Air, 6 Aug. 2018, www.ens-cleanair.com/en/new-positive-results-for-the-smog-free-tower/.

“Oceans.” The Ocean Cleanup, 2016, theoceancleanup.com/oceans/.

Staff, Ng. “Ocean Trash: 5.25 Trillion Pieces and Counting, but Big Questions Remain.” National Geographic, 29 Nov. 2017, www.nationalgeographic.com/news/2015/1/150109-oceans-plastic-sea-trash-science-marine-debris/.