Capitalism and Sustainability

Capitalism is an ideology that fuels growth, described in the Oxford English Dictionary as “an economic system … for the purpose of profit.” This sounds all well and good; profit is how businesses run, profit prioritization means more businesses doing well, it means more money gets made.

[1] Industrial Production 1920-2020
               While it sounds great on the surface, the effect of a constant drive for increasing profit is an ever-growing market for production in order to achieve these higher profits. Capitalists and those against them could spend days debating about whether or not this is beneficial for the economy or well-being or any other issue. What is important in this article is the sustainability of capitalism. Referring to figure 2, a graph that depicts total CO2 emissions since the Industrial Revolution (the expansion point of modern capitalism). Since 1750, emissions have increased from .1 gigatons of carbon dioxide per year to a whopping 37.79 in 2023, double 1980’s number and about seven times as much CO2 as total production in 1950.

[2] Carbon Dioxide Production 1750-2023
               These numbers alone mean nothing; we must first understand why CO2 production is important to consider as a threat to the environment. Well, even a Trump government explains this on the “climate.gov” website. CO2 absorbs heat emitted by the Earth’s surface and releases it back towards Earth. In fact, the government website claims that “carbon dioxide alone is responsible for about 80 percent of the total heating influence of all human-produced greenhouse gases since 1990.”

But wait! That isn’t all. Limiting CO2 emissions are also important because it helps prevent a phenomenon referred to as “ocean acidification.” A process in which CO2 dissolves in the ocean, creating carbonic acid. This excess oxygen has, “since the start of the Industrial Revolution, [caused] the pH of the ocean’s surface waters [to drop] from 8.21 to 8.10,” directly leading to harm on marine life’s ability to perform basic life functions (Climte.gov).

So, CO2 emissions cause the world to heat up, and maybe that’s bad, but what could do better?

Boy, am I glad that someone asked!

Often capitalism is postured to be the perfect strategy for climate change prevention. Capitalism is said to increase innovation which can help create more climate friendly models of production and green technologies that can prevent the effects of the impending climate crisis.

This is another example where, as great as this sounds on paper, in reality, capitalism only ever stifles the long-term solutions required to prevent global warming.

The model of increasing production in order to eventually decrease it is referred to as “green growth.” Green growth is not a theory, but the reality of the status quo. For example, in the years after the 2008 recession a small portion of stimulus packages were put towards climate investment, a move that justified the expansion of practices such as fracking that further the deterioration of the global ecosystem (Taherzadeh).

Green growth is a short-sighted and temporary goal. The Biden administration LOVED green growth, investing hundreds of billions of dollars into proposed climate solutions like extending EV tax credits, energy tax credits, and loans for the Department of Energy (“Factsheet”). Each of these reforms, and more, have been overturned by the Trump administration.

The result of Biden’s policies was a flimsy justification for increased production because climate spending was higher than ever, only for the climate spending to halt and production to increase even further. Short term liberal policies only pander to voters, achieving little change that lasts; instead, the only long-term solution is a multifaceted strategy for degrowth and an increase in technology that mitigates the coming impacts of climate collapse.

The transition from a profit society to a degrowth economy is not easy, but it is one that is necessary in the face of ever-expanding global warming. Just this week, news outlets reported that “The World’s First Climate Tipping Point Has Been Crossed” (Shah, Readfearn). It is too late to try and fix capitalism; we need an alternative—we need to take risks.

[3] Global Temperature Increase since 1940
               Degrowth can be defined, loosely, as “a democratically deliberated absolute reduction of material and energy throughput, which ensures well-being for all within planetary boundaries” (“Degrowth and Strategy”). A plurality of approaches is needed to achieve a world where production is decreased by the volume necessary to prevent, should prevention even be possible at this point, climate collapse. One degrowth proponent and anthropologist, Jason Hickel, wrote in his 2020 book, Less is More: How Degrowth Will Save the World, that degrowth should be a slow, transitional period. He focuses on reducing waste (ie. Right to repair, no more warranties, and prevent food waste), changing the economic structure to expand public services, and eliminate substantial portions of wasteful industries (arms manufacturing, fossil fuels, and advertising).

Hickel’s solution might have been reasonable a decade or two ago, before we exceeded the 1.5°C mark, but I am calling for more radical action. In order to prevent climate collapse there needs to be a drastic restructuring of our priorities, degrowth alone will only slow the doom that humanity is heading towards. In addition to slowing production and decreasing waste, we need to undo centuries of damage in a fraction of the time.

As previously mentioned, carbon monoxide is THE pollutant. Removing the gas is unavoidable, and the earlier we transition to using resources to develop climate removal technology, the sooner the world can begin to heal. These solutions are numerous, some involving technology, others involving natural solutions, and others combining the two (Naimoli).

To conclude, capitalism is a system that directly leads to environmental harm, with its proposed solutions bringing about no needed change. We live in a world on its death bed and capitalism is its weird holistic medicine daughter who won’t let the doctors do the job that needs to be done. Degrowth and carbon dioxide reduction are the doctors we need.

This post is limited in detail in many of its elements, so I encourage the reader to expand their knowledge, read the sources linked or do further research in how capitalism is killing the planet.

Greener Beef

Greener Beef 

Over the past few decades, society has begun to push back against global warming, slashing CO2 emissions, and implementing green policies. But while CO2 has remained a primary focus, other greenhouse gases like methane have been forgotten. Methane is primarily released as a result of agriculture, more specifically, cattle. These large ruminants release over 30% of all global methane, impacting the environment beyond their already enormous consumption needs. However, a recent discovery may change this problem forever. By supplementing bovine diets with a small amount of seaweed, scientists have shown an astonishing 82% methane reduction! While only being demonstrated at a small scale, this slight diet change could be the next step towards sustainable cattle farming. 

How do Greenhouse Gases Affect the Environment? 

Before we discuss how seaweed reduces methane emissions, it is essential to understand how greenhouse gases, like methane, cause global warming. Greenhouse gases heat up the atmosphere by trapping heat from the sun, warming the planet, and driving climate change. We can see the impacts of the greenhouse effect in the increasingly erratic weather patterns across the globe, loss of polar and glacial ice, and rising sea level. Carbon dioxide is the most well-known greenhouse gas because it is released in large quantities from burning fossil fuels, cement production, and deforestation. It remains in the atmosphere for centuries, causing long-term warming. On the other hand, methane is much more potent in the short term, over 25 times stronger than CO₂ at trapping heat, but it persists for a shorter time in the atmosphere.  

How does Seaweed help solve this issue? 

A big share of globally produced methane comes from agriculture, especially cows. When cattle digest their food, microbes in their stomachs (the rumen) break down grasses and release methane through a process called enteric fermentation. Researchers have found that a red seaweed called Asparagopsis taxiformis can sharply cut methane from cattle. In a 2021 study, Roque et al. showed that adding a small amount of this seaweed to cow feed reduced methane emissions by more than 80%, without affecting animal health or growth. This is thanks to a natural compound called bromoform found in this seaweed. It disrupts the enzymes that methane-producing microbes in the rumen rely on, and with that process blocked, cows produce far less methane. 

How would this be implemented? 

The truth is that scaling this project will be challenging to say the least. Growing enough Asparagopsis for millions of cattle means expanding sustainable seaweed farming will be quite a challenge. Scaling production in a sustainable manner and evaluating the impact that oceanic monocropping may have must be considered. There are also open questions about long-term effects on animals and whether the methane cuts last. Still, the potential is huge. If global cattle emissions fell by 82%, as lab studies suggest, annual global warming could be reduced by 5-8%, buying us the essential time we need to solve climate change. While feeding cattle seaweed won’t solve climate change, it is an important discovery on a journey to greener beef. 

Breanna M. Roque, Marielena Venegas, Robert D. Kinley, Rocky de Nys, Toni L. Duarte, Xiang Yang, Ermias Kebreab. Red seaweed (Asparagopsis taxiformis) supplementation reduces enteric methane by over 80 percent in beef steers. PLOS ONE, 2021; 16 (3): e0247820 DOI: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0247820

Shan, Yuli, et al. “Global Methane Footprints Growth and Drivers 1990–2023.” Nature Communications, vol. 16, no. 2147, 2025, pp. 1–12. Nature Publishing Group, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-63383-5  

Lau, Bon. “What Are the Major Sources of Methane in the Atmosphere?” Earth.Org, 12 Dec. 2022, https://earth.org/sources-of-methane-in-the-atmosphere/  

Greener Grazing. (n.d.). Greenergrazing.org. https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.greenergrazing.org%2F&psig=AOvVaw0I72QLNh8Tnmo0xVwo0365&ust=1760658157935000&source=images&cd=vfe&opi=89978449&ved=0CBYQjRxqFwoTCNjuq_Owp5ADFQAAAAAdAAAAABAE  

 

Swinging For Sustainability

Either endless stretches of lush grass with ponds reflecting the morning sun or the frustration that creeps into your mind when you’re trying to hit a golf ball in the air come to mind when people think of golf. Having said that, golf courses are made to be aesthetically pleasing. Beneath this serene picture, however, is a long-running controversy: are golf courses environmentally friendly or harmful? Modern sustainable golf practices demonstrate that golf can actually promote biodiversity, resource conservation, and community engagement—values that reflect the sustainable spirit of living here inthe Greenbelt—though some critics contend that the sport’s manicured elegance comes at an ecological cost.

Figure 1. The Furman Golf Course, a stroll away from the Greenbelt’s Cabin and Cottage, is one of Furman’s most beautiful creations.

I witness this balance on a daily basis as a resident of the Greenbelt community. I live in the Cabin, and the Furman Golf Course is just a short stroll away. As a casual golfer, I’ve learned to value both the game’s difficulty and the setting in which it is played. The course is one of the most serene areas of campus because of its undulating greens and shaded trees. However, I’ve frequently questioned whether preserving that beauty is too expensive.

It’s true that there has been harsh environmental criticism of golf. Vibrant turf and well-kept fairways are not natural. For upkeep, they need fertilizer, pesticides, and water. Groundwater near Florida golf courses has been found to be contaminated with pesticides, demonstrating how maintenance practices can negatively impact local ecosystems (U.S. Geological Survey, 1995). The sport appears wasteful because golf courses in drier regions of the world can use millions of gallons of water every day. From that angle, it’s simple to see why some might believe that golf is bad for sustainability.

But at Furman, the golf course tells a more hopeful story. The fairways are surrounded by native trees, and it’s common to see waterfowl by the ponds or hawks gliding over the pines. Despite their apparent insignificance, these details show a growing movement to make golf

Figure 2. Native wildlife thrives on the golf courses thanks to protected natural areas.

courses more ecologically conscious. According to research from the Stockholm Resilience Centre, courses that preserve natural areas and use native plants can actually increase biodiversity rather than decrease it (Colding & Folke, 2008). A comparable initiative at the Yahara Hills golf course in Madison, Wisconsin, restored oak savannas and prairies, reintroducing native species (City of Madison, 2025). If handled properly, golf can be a part of the solution rather than the enemy of the environment.

Figure 3. Modern golf courses use recycled water and smart irrigation to conserve natural resources.

One of the main issues facing golf courses is ater use, but many are adjusting. According to the United States Golf Association (USGA), more than 60% of American golf courses currently employ drought-resistant grasses, efficient irrigation, and recycled water (USGA, 2023). Similar sustainable practices are used on the Furman course, such as native vegetation surrounding ponds to reduce runoff and controlled irrigation zones. These kinds of efforts show that golf can move away from wastefulness toward real conservation.

 

Figure 4. Electric carts and solar-powered facilities help reduce golf’s carbon footprint.

            Golf is also taking steps to address climate change. Research by Bekken and Soldat (2021) found that while maintenance activities release some emissions, trees, turfgrass, and other vegetation can offset a large portion of that carbon when managed properly. Some courses are even switching to electric equipment and renewable energy sources. Beyond that, courses create green spaces that lower surrounding temperatures and improve air quality: benefits that matter a lot in increasingly urbanized areas (USGA, 2023).

Not everyone is persuaded, of course. Some continue to contend that the planet suffers as a result of golf’s obsession with perfection, which includes lush greens, spotless sand traps, and exquisite ponds. Deforestation and chemicals were major components of older courses. However, things are beginning to change. Pesticide use has significantly decreased as a result of the widespread adoption of organic fertilizers and integrated pest management (IPM) (USDA, 2024). In order to avoid the need for complete deforestation, new courses are frequently constructed on previously developed or degraded land (Colding & Folke, 2008). Golf’s image of wastefulness is gradually giving way to one of renewal and restoration.

The Furman course’s ability to unite people is what I appreciate most about it being close by. It is a part of the community and not just a place to play. According to Sustainable Golf (2024), a lot of courses now offer community service projects and environmental education programs that help link leisure with accountability. Living in the Cabin and occasionally going to the Furman Golf Course has made me realize that sustainability isn’t always about sacrificing something; sometimes it’s about reevaluating what we already have.

Figure 5. The Furman Golf Course serves as both recreation space and community hub for its campus.

The elegance of golf and its environmental challenges don’t have to be mutually exclusive. The development of the sport demonstrates that when people care enough to make them work together, leisure and sustainability can coexist. Golf courses like Furman’s can change from being representations of excess to being models of balance by increasing biodiversity, conserving water, lowering emissions, and encouraging community involvement. The course next door serves as a reminder to those of us in the Greenbelt that progress, not perfection, is what true sustainability is all about. By deciding to “swing in sustainability,” we’re not only enhancing our performance but also making an investment in the wellbeing of the planet where we play.

 

References:

Bekken, M., & Soldat, D. (2021). The Climate Impact of Golf Courses: Carbon Emissions and Management.
City of Madison. (2025). Advancing Golf Course Ecological Stewardship.
Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2008). The Role of Golf Courses in Biodiversity Conservation and Ecosystem Management.Stockholm Resilience Centre.

Furman Golf Club. (n.d.). Golf Course in Greenville, SC | Public Golf Course. Accessed October 9, 2025, https://www.furmangolfclub.com

Hoover Pumping Systems. (n.d.). Golf course irrigation trends to watch in 2024. Accessed October 9, 2025
Peña, C., et al. (2023). Environmental Impacts by Golf Courses and Strategies to Minimize Them.
Sustainable Golf. (2024). Community Engagement Through Sustainable Course Management.
United States Geological Survey (USGS). (1995). Pesticide Contamination in Groundwater at Florida Golf Courses.
United States Golf Association (USGA). (2023). Golf Course Environmental Benefits and Best Management Practices.

U.S. Golf Association. (n.d.). Fore the golfer: Wildlife on golf courses. Accessed October 9, 2025

Soap Opera: Why Dishwashers Win the Sustainability Showdown

Soap Opera: Why Dishwashers Win the Sustainability Showdown

 

         Renovated in 2020, the Greenbelt community is home to The Cabin and The Cottage, each equipped with energy-saving features and awesome amenities like an awesome kitchen. One notable absence from the cabin, however, is the lack of a dishwasher. Hand washing dishes has long been seen as the more eco-conscious method of cleaning. However, modern dishwashers have shattered this longstanding myth. Studies show that today’s energy-efficient dishwashers use significantly less water and energy than handwashing, even when factoring in small loads. This surprising reality makes dishwashers not just a convenience but a tool for sustainable living. In this blog, I will explain why Furman should implement dishwashers in the Greenbelt houses in order to truly follow through on the sustainability claims that we make.

            The cabin piles up dishes in the sink at an enormous rate. Whether it is from ramen cravings late at night or having tons of people over who need cups for their drinks, dishwashing stays in high demand. This means long shifts spent scrubbing away in the kitchen that result in high water usage. One of the most compelling environmental advantages of using a modern dishwasher lies in its efficient water usage. Hand-washing dishes can use up to 20 gallons of water per session, depending on the duration and flow rate of the faucet. In contrast, Energy Star-certified dishwashers use as little as 3-5 gallons per cycle, regardless of load size. This drastic reduction is achieved through advanced spray mechanisms, filtration systems, and water recycling technology that ensure maximum cleaning power with minimal waste. Over time, this efficiency translates to significant water savings, especially in water-scarce areas or during drought seasons. By reducing water consumption without sacrificing cleanliness, dishwashers present a clear win for both the environment and resource-conscious households. On top of the ecological benefits, implementing Energy Star-certified dishwashers would pay for itself over time. On average, the cost for a dishwasher with installation falls around $1200. Throughout its life, the dishwashers would save approximately $3200 in energy compared to hand washing, so the initial payment can be justified financially.

 

The average range to install a new

dishwasher is ~$1000 – $1500.

            With the implementation of dishwashers, maximizing their cost-effectiveness and environmental impact is essential, and many students might not be informed on how to accomplish that. Providing a guide on how to use each dishwasher most effectively is a good idea to help ignorant students. This should include a strong suggestion to scrape plates before racking them in the washer and only running it when it is fully loaded to minimize the number of washes, which reduces energy cost and the lifetime of the machine.

            It would certainly be an investment for Furman and there are some small downsides like the occasional repair that will need to be done and the space that having a dishwasher takes up, but with the new renovations to North Village, now seems like the right time for Furman to take a step towards a more sustainable campus.

 

References-

“Is It Greener to Hand Wash or Use a Dishwasher?” Green Choices,

https://www.greenchoices.org/green-living/at-home/is-it-greener-to-hand-wash-or-use-a-dishwasher.

“How Much Does Dishwasher Installation Cost?” Angi,

            www.angi.com/articles/how-much-does-dishwasher-installation-cost.htm#.

“How Much Water Does a Dishwasher Use?” Home Matters,

www.ahs.com/home-matters/quick-tips/how-much-water-does-a-dishwasher-use/.

Vampire Energy Sucks

It is common knowledge that electricity runs the modern world we live in. Here in the US, the simplest actions like turning on a lamp or charging a phone require electricity. Having instant access to electricity is something that I know I often take for granted. I know this because I find that I have a hard time adapting to life without electricity when we lose it due to a bad storm. Another thing about America is that we expend an incredibly unhealthy amount of energy. Given recent efforts to find more affordable and sustainable energy sources, it is imperative that we understand the unnecessary energy that we are already expending every day, without even knowing it.

What is It-

Vampire energy, also called standby power or phantom power is defined by the website “Save on Energy” as “the energy that’s wasted around your home when devices are plugged in and using power, but you’re not actively using them.” At first glance, this may not seem like that big of a problem, but when you really investigate how many appliances and devices we have plugged in at home, the amount of wasted energy can reach extremely high levels. In fact, of the devices using electricity in the average home, around 75% of the energy is used when they aren’t even on.

Smart power strips like this one prevent excess energy consumption.

Another statistic shows that for the average home, vampire energy causes an extra $100 or more per year on your energy bill. 

How to Limit Vampire Energy-

Now that we know what vampire energy is, the next step is learning what options you have to limit the amount of energy that goes to waste. There are many options to stop vampire energy, with the simplest being to unplug your devices when they are not in use. Although this may sound impractical, one way to simplify this is to use power strips for many devices, such as chargers, small electronics, and electronics. This way, all it takes is for one switch to be flipped to stop vampire energy in all the devices connected. While on the topic of power strips, another method to stop vampire energy is to invest in smart power strips, which are designed to automatically cut power to devices when they are not in use or during specific hours. Lastly, when purchasing new appliances/electronics, search for “ENERGY STAR” rated products. These products are designed to consume less power both when they are and aren’t in use.

Benefits of Limiting Vampire Energy-

Vampire energy cost by appliance per year

Vampire energy affects both the environment and your pocketbook. First off, the amount of excess energy that is produced from devices when they are not in use adds up over time and has a negative environmental impact. To meet the high demand of electricity, more energy must be created, much of it through unsustainable practices, which in turn contribute to increased greenhouse gas emissions. Secondly, vampire energy simply runs up the cost on your electrical bill. So, if you want to live more sustainably and save your money, consider following the simple steps to reduce the amount of vampire energy wherever you live.

 

References

Admin. “What Is Vampire Energy & How to Reduce It.” Now Power, 9 Oct. 2023, https://nowpowertexas.com/what-is-vampire-energy-how-to-reduce-it/.

Payless Power. “A Guide to Getting Rid of Electronics Sucking Your Energy.” Payless Power, 12 June 2023, paylesspower.com/blog/vampire-energy/.

“Phantom Loads.” Https://Www.Mpsutility.Com/, www.mpsutility.com/index.php/en/energy-conservation/47-phantom-loads. Accessed 3 Dec. 2024.

“What’s Phantom Power and How Can You Track It?” Identifying and Tracking Your Home’s Phantom Power | Save on Energy, saveonenergy.ca/en/For-Your-Home/Advice-and-Tips/Phantom-power. Accessed 3 Dec. 2024.

 

Considering More Sustainable Energy Solutions

Renewable energy has become a very common topic of conversation as it has become more apparent that we are overly dependent on fossil fuels. The United States alone consumed 62,066 kWh of energy from fossil fuels alone. Fossil fuel is not an unlimited resource either, so to keep up with our energy demands and to help keep our planet

Graph showing fossil fuel consumption per capita in 2023

clean many people are now using more clean energy systems, such as solar power.

Solar energy harnesses the power of the sun to generate heat and electricity. In fact, The amount of sunlight that strikes the earth’s surface in an hour and a half is enough to handle the entire world’s energy consumption for a full year. Solar technology uses Photovoltaic (PV) panels or a system of mirrors to concentrate the solar radiation. The energy can be used to generate electricity or it can be stored in batteries for later use. The main advantage to solar energy is its positive environmental impact. Solar power generation creates no greenhouse gas emissions, a significant improvement over fossil fuels. Additionally solar panel systems require very little water for maintenance, which can be beneficial in drought prone areas. Thanks to developments in the past decade solar energy has become even more efficient and affordable.

 

According to the International Energy Agency, solar energy is among the most affordable sources of energy costing approximately $32.78 per megawatt-hour, compared to coal which is widely used and costs around $72.78. Although many people have concerns about expensive installation costs for getting solar panels, most people will end up having significant savings over a 25 year period. There are online calculators that show approximately how much money you can save based on current energy consumption and how much sun your home receives. By estimating my home’s energy use and how much daylight I receive based on my home’s location, the estimated net savings over 25 years would be $70,000 dollars. While the initial cost of installation might be high, I wouldn’t mind keeping that additional 70000 around for a rainy day. Aside from being relatively inexpensive, solar energy also helps to stimulate the economy. In electricity generation, solar was the fastest growing technology, adding 17,212 jobs in 2021. This is a growth of 5.4% that occurred during an economic downturn.

 

As promising as solar energy is, there are some challenges to fully implementing solar energy systems. For example, it’s not always sunny so there has to be either a backup energy source to be used when it’s cloudy or at nighttime. Alternatively the energy could be stored in batteries, but those can be expensive for containing large amounts of energy. Land use is another important thing to consider. To implement solar energy on a large scale a significant amount of space is required to house the PV panels, which can lead to conflicts over land use. However there are innovative solutions such as rooftop solar and solar panels that can float on bodies of water.

Image of floating solar panel system that is currently operating in China

Solar energy is an important resource that we as a society should strongly consider investing more in. On a more local level, I would like Furman to better utilize solar power. While we do have a large solar farm, I think we could do better. Why not expand the use of solar panels for water heating in the Greenbelt Community to other residences? We need to be able to make the developments on a local scale to be able to globally transition to clean energy.

 

References:

https://energycentral.com/c/ec/comparing-costs-renewable-and-conventional-energy-sources

https://www.weforum.org/stories/2022/07/renewable-energy-jobs-us/#:~:text=In%20electricity%20generation%2C%20solar%20was%20the%20fastest%20growing,opportunities%20in%20the%20US%2C%20a%20new%20report%20finds.

https://ourworldindata.org/fossil-fuels

https://www.energy.gov/eere/solar/how-does-solar-work

 

 

Thrifting For The Environment, Not Just For The Deals

Ever since I was a small kid I can remember going thrifting with my parents. The vibrant clothes, the massive shoes, and the strange and miscolored furniture, I can still remember it so clearly. While I wasn’t always the most enthusiastic about staying at the local Goodwill for hours at a time, it’s something I now look back on with a smile. Even to this day it still feels like a treasure hunt every time I walk into a second-hand apparel store, a feeling that has never gone away since I first started thrifting.

 

 

 

Thrifted yet fashionable clothes from my childhood

 

 

 

 

Living in the Greenbelt housing has really opened my eyes to how thrifting and overall recycling items can be highly beneficial to living a sustainable lifestyle. My closet consists of about 90% thrifted clothes, which saves me money and allows me to explore many different styles that I never would have found otherwise. Recently some of my fellow cabin members and I have been working on a free store that essentially has the same concept as a thrift store, except for the fact that everything is free. This project has reignited my passion for thrifting and recycling clothes, and I hope to foster a community built upon repurposing the things we no longer want. One man’s trash is another man’s treasure after all.

Thrifting not only saves you money, but it also helps save the environment. You can almost hear the money rolling in. According to roundup.org, over 100 billion garments are made every year, and on top of this over 92 million tons of clothing end up in landfills. It may be easy to blame the fashion industry for all of the excess clothing being produced, but it’s also important for us as consumers to take ownership of our fault in it as well. Consumers on average own 60% more clothing than they did 15 years ago, but each item is only worn 50% as often as we used to. This excessive consumerism and overproduction has long-lasting effects on the environment around us, as many of these garments contain fossil-fuel heavy synthetic garments (plastic, polyester, nylon) which don’t break down naturally in the environment. Instead they end up as microplastics, which when ingested can cause DNA damage, reproductive harm, and can change your gene activity, which increases the risk of cancer. As a whole, the overproduction and overconsumption of clothes and other garments has nothing but negative effects for our environment and for us.

So you may be asking yourself, “How can I help combat this unsustainable practice?” Well have I got the solution for you. Thrifting gives clothes a new purpose rather than ending up in a landfill, which greatly helps reduce pollution and waste. In addition, spending your hard earned cash on second-hand clothes not only saves you money but helps cut down on overconsumption of new clothes as well. So what are we waiting for? Give thrifting a try today!

 

References

Ruiz, Arabella. “17 Most Worrying Textile Waste Statistics & Facts.” The Roundup, 18 Mar. 2024, https://theroundup.org/textile-waste-statistics/. Accessed 21 Nov. 2024.

Dutchen, Stephanie. “Microplastics Everywhere.” Harvard Medicine Magazine, Spring 2023, https://magazine.hms.harvard.edu/articles/microplastics-everywhere. Accessed 21 Nov. 2024.

Van Brande, Helena. “6 Unsustainable Fabrics to Avoid.” This Green Lifestyle, 11 Dec. 2023, https://www.thisgreenlifestyle.com/all-articles/6-unsustainable-fabrics-to-avoid. Accessed 21 Nov. 2024.

Boyle, Rob. “What Is Upcycling?” Emission Index, updated 21 June 2024, https://www.emission-index.com/carbon-footprint/upcycling. Accessed 21 Nov. 2024.

 

How Cars are Impacting the Environment and Ourselves?

One of the biggest advantages of being a freshman that we probably took for granted at the time is the proximity to some of the most frequented buildings on campus. Last year, the furthest walk was at most a quarter mile, but things have drastically changed this year with living in the Greenbelt Housing. Now, it’s a minimum quarter mile walk to make it to the dining hall or closest class buildings and other classes being over a half mile away and the PAC being even further at almost three quarters of a mile. I know these distances still are not that far but the time it takes to walk up to triples thus becoming much more appealing to drive from place to place.

 

A map of the Furman campus with paths from different housing illustrating the different lengths.

 

As we all know, this is definitely not a good thing for the environment, especially when you are just trying to save yourself a couple minutes out of convenience. To be more specific about the impacts cars have even in such a short drive, they “emit about 400 grams of CO2 per mile” and this doesn’t account for other greenhouse gasses emitted or those emitted in the production of the car and gasoline it uses (EPA). This means that every time someone drives from the cabin just to the chapel parking lot and back their car emits 600 grams of CO2, which goes directly into the atmosphere to further the effects of global warming. This number does not seem like a lot when all of human emissions have increased to over 36 billion tons per year, but it does not account for the many times it happens in a year or how easily avoidable it is. CO2 contributes to global warming by “absorbing heat radiating from the Earth’s surface and re-release it in all directions—including back toward Earth’s surface” as all greenhouse gasses do (Lindsey). The focus of greenhouse gasses is on CO2 because of its prevalence in the atmosphere and drastically higher impact on global warming with it being “responsible for about two-thirds of the total heating influence of all human-produced greenhouse gasses” (Lindsey). 

 

Graph from Climate.gov illustrating the direct correlation between the increased emissions and CO2 in the atmosphere.

 

Bringing this back specifically to the Cabin, there is no need for us to drive simply across campus to save ourselves the slightest convenience and time, especially with the emissions coming from such a short drive. The emissions seem minimal right now but over time it all adds up, and as residents of the Greenbelt, we should be more concerned with any way we can reduce our emissions because of their effect on the environment. All of us are fully capable of walking or biking over to the main parts of campus or the PAC, so those options should take precedence over a drive. Also, this would not only decrease our emissions as a community and school, but walks and other forms of physical exertion have been linked to increase in mental health.

As college students, we are all stressed by nature, so why not add an extra walk to our day since it takes a load off our shoulders. The American Psychological Association has found up to a “25% lowered risk of depression among adults who got the recommended amount of physical activity per week” (Pearce). These extra walks that we avoid by driving across campus would easily get us to that recommended amount of activity thus improving our mental health and giving us a better outlook on the rest of our day. Based on this and the environmental impacts of driving, there is no good reason for us to be driving across campus despite the increase of distance this year and inconvenience.

 

 

Campus Map.

chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.furman.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/174/2020/03/Campus-Map.pdf. 

DeAngelis, Tori. “Want to boost your mental health? Take a walk.” APA, 1 November 2022, https://www.apa.org/monitor/2022/11/defeating-depression-naturally. Accessed 19 November 2024.

“Greenhouse Gas Emissions from a Typical Passenger Vehicle.” EPA, 23 August 2024, https://www.epa.gov/greenvehicles/greenhouse-gas-emissions-typical-passenger-vehicle#driving. Accessed 18 November 2024.

Lindsey, Rebecca. “Climate Change: Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide.” Climate.gov, 9 April 2024, https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide#:~:text=Without%20carbon%20dioxide%2C%20Earth’s%20natural,causing%20global%20temperature%20to%20rise.. Accessed 18 November 2024.

 

Why Its important To Remain Sustainable Post Election

          November 5, 2024 millions of Americans were glued to their screen. Living in the Eco Cottage, my house was anxious longing for a president that would protect our climate. We were longing for a president that would acknowledge the sustainable foundations we have built in our lives here.                                                                        

           As a sustainability student, we are aware of what climate change is and how it affects our environment. Majority of people when voting are unaware of policies that are in support of our environment versus policies that would harm the environment. It is important to look at the policies of the people we elect. The United States currently holds different policies while also having a task force for climate change. This task first was forged in 2015 when the Paris New Deal was adopted as a treaty by international nations. The United Nations refers to the New Deal  as “ a landmark in the multilateral climate change process because, for the first time, a binding agreement brings all nations together to combat climate change and adapt to its effects”.     

                                          

                    

Under this Deal, President Biden currently has a national goal to reduce carbon emissions by 50%-52% by 2030. The US is also tackling climate change with the Inflation Reduction Act. This act called for clean energy incentives. The act currently has caused clean energy to surge in all fifty states. The US also passed the Kigali amendment that reduces HFC’s. HFCs make up some of the greenhouse gasses admitted into our environment. We also have pledged alongside 155 other countries to cut down methane admissions to 30%.

As the new presidency starts, we have to be aware of what the next leader has planned. Currently, our president-elect wants to repeal all climate change policies passed by the former government. As we are aware of what the president elect can do due to his former presidency, it is reasonable to be fearful. In the past, we have been faced with this president wanting to pull out of the Paris deal and any other major climate incentives. When faced with putting the economy over livelihood what can one do? Scientists have a grim estimation of what climate change can and will do to us. It is important to be aware that the  science lets us know that the furthering of climate change will lead to droughts, sea levels rising, malnutrition, worsening storms, and other atrocities. With this grim prediction, it feels like  our impacts are miniscule. Living sustainably means living for a better future. The use of sustainable practices by the average American is impactful in the fight against climate change.We can continue to promote sustainability through recycling, walking instead of driving, or even managing food waste. However, the most important thing to push for sustainability is to vote. We must be aware of how the laws the government passes affects our planet. Local and state legislators pus the laws that determine our future. If we want to see a better planet tomorrow, it is important to be educated today.

                                             

                                                              References:

 The United States Government. (2024, August 9). National Climate Task Force. The White House. https://www.whitehouse.gov/climate/#:~:text=Reducing%20U.S.%20greenhouse%20gas%20emissions,clean%20energy%20to%20disadvantaged%20communities 

Climate change impacts are increasing for Americans. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (n.d.). https://www.noaa.gov/news-release/climate-change-impacts-are-increasing-for-americans

Higgins, T., & Lespier, D. (2024a, July 26). The Biden Administration has taken more climate action than any other in history. Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-biden-administration-has-taken-more-climate-action-than-any-other-in-history/ 

Lashof, D. (2024, July 30). Tracking progress: Climate action under the biden administration. World Resources Institute. https://www.wri.org/insights/biden-administration-tracking-climate-action-progress 

1, N., 11, J., 14, A., & 13, S. (2024, November 6). Clean economy works: Tracking new clean energy projects across U.S.E2. https://e2.org/announcements/ 

Inflation reduction act. U.S. Department of the Treasury. (2024, October 17). https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/inflation-reduction-act#:~:text=Across%20the%20economy%2C%20the%20IRA,good%20wages%20for%20those%20efforts. 

U.S. Department of State. (n.d.). U.S. Department of State. https://www.state.gov/u-s-ratification-of-the-kigali-amendment/ 

Trump Issues Executive Order on Climate Change. Trump Issues Executive Order on Climate Change | Sabin Center for Climate Change Law. (n.d.). https://climate.law.columbia.edu/content/trump-issues-executive-order-climate-change-0 

 

 

 

Differences in Sustainable Lifestyles in Europe and the USA

I grew up in Vinnytsia, a medium-sized town in Ukraine with a population of around 400,000. For 17 years, I traveled throughout Europe. When I moved to the USA, I had to adapt to many lifestyle changes. I have always been interested in sustainability and have diligently followed this topic online. It seemed that U.S. citizens discuss and share information about sustainability the most, which gives the impression that they are the most concerned.

Hanging out spots in Kyiv, Ukraine, in the middle of an orchard.

My experience after moving here has revealed why this is the case. Living sustainably in the USA is quite complicated and needs to be consistently addressed, whereas in Europe, it tends to be a natural part of daily life, and people find it comfortable.

The first difference I noticed is the easy accessibility of products in the USA, which often leads to excessive consumerism. In the USA, you can get almost anything you want within a few days if you shop on Amazon, or even within minutes if you drive to a store. This is not the case in Europe, where the variety of products is more limited. If you’re looking for something specific, you may have to spend a lot of time searching for it and might eventually realize that you don’t really need it after all. And I think it is a good thing.

One of the many pedestrian-only streets in Heraklion, Greece

It helps prevent impulsive buying and encourages consumers to purchase only what they truly need.

The second difference is ways of commuting. Oh, how I miss my rides on trams, trolleybuses, and trains.

Me on the train traveling between cities comfortably and affordably!

In Ukraine, teenagers typically do not own cars, and most families have only one car, at most two; there isn’t a separate car for each person. To be honest, people in Ukraine don’t need cars. Public transportation can take you anywhere you want to go, starting at 5 AM and operating until midnight. I used to travel alone on public transport to my music school since I was six years old, and I never had any issues with it. It is safe, comfortable, affordable, and widely used by our population. Additionally, public transport allows you to relax.

Beautiful walkable and bicycle-friendly Warsaw, Poland

Driving makes me feel exhausted because I have to constantly focus on the road. In contrast, while using public transport, you can read a book, do some work, or even take a nap. This makes traveling within cities and between them much easier and less tiring. Moreover, cities in Ukraine and Europe are very accessible for bicycles.

Beautiful walkable and bicycle-friendly Vinnytsia, Ukraine!

We have bike lanes everywhere, which makes it even more convenient to commute. Additionally, most towns in Europe and Ukraine are extremely walkable, so you can easily get whatever you need within a short walk.

The fourth difference is waste management. Europe has actively promoted the concept of a circular economy, emphasizing waste reduction through recycling and sustainable practices. The EU has implemented various regulations and directives aimed at minimizing single-use plastics, encouraging recycling, and promoting the eco-design of products. These initiatives are designed to create a closed loop that reduces environmental impact while enhancing sustainable consumption and production

5 types of recycling bins in Italy. Source: https://www.panorama.it/economia/italy-has-a-new-app-to-promote-separate-collection-waste

(ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES – Why Is Europe More Environmentally Conscious than the U.S.?” 2024). For instance, in Italy, waste is taxed, and individuals can face fines for improper separation of recyclables. In Ukraine, waste is also separated and recycled. Many people choose to shop with their own reusable bags, drink from reusable bottles, and bring their own cups to coffee shops when ordering takeout. Additionally, consumers must pay for plastic bags, and there is legislation that allows EU member states to ban plastic bags entirely (Casavant 2018).

I myself experienced firsthand how your surroundings shape your choices. For instance, when deciding what to eat, I find it much harder to resist the temptation of ordering fast food instead of making an effort to cook a well-balanced meal at home, especially when I am tired and short on time. However, it’s not just about your surroundings; governance and legislation play a crucial role as well, often even more so. The EU’s commitment to the Paris Agreement exemplifies a collective effort to combat climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions (UNFCCC, 2024). While certain states and cities in the U.S. have implemented progressive ecological measures, the lack of cohesive federal policies has hindered the country’s overall commitment to sustainability (“ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES – Why Is Europe More Environmentally Conscious than the U.S.?” 2024).

In my opinion, there are several reasons why people in Ukraine tend to be environmentally conscious. Personally, I never considered consuming only what you need and saving energy and water as sustainability practices; it’s simply how I was taught to live. I believe this attitude is largely influenced by Ukraine’s history. Living in a post-Soviet country, which has faced economic challenges, encourages people to turn off lights when they’re done using them, keep the water running only when necessary, walk instead of driving, and choose affordable food options, often from local markets. While many aspire to achieve the American dream, it’s important to recognize the trade-offs associated with that lifestyle.

Our beautiful cottage!

In conclusion, since moving to the USA, I have had to adjust to many lifestyle changes. However, living in the Cottage has fostered an environment and community that supports and encourages me, along with others, to practice and learn more about sustainable living and keep each other accountable. Let’s be mindful of our actions and try our best to not allow our surroundings to dictate our choices!

Works cited:

UNFCCC. 2024. “The Paris Agreement.” United Nations Climate Change. United Nations. 2024. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement.

“ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES – Why Is Europe More Environmentally Conscious than the U.S.?” 2024. Www.greenunion.co.uk. 2024. https://www.greenunion.co.uk/lifestyle/1621/ENVIRONMENTAL-ISSUES—Why-Is-Europe-More-Environmentally-Conscious-Than-The-U.S.%3F.

Casavant, Morgan. 2018. “5 Sustainable Living Practices Europe Teaches the Rest of the World.” YouAlignedTM. January 21, 2018. https://youaligned.com/lifestyle/sustainable-living-europe/.