Conversations in Rogue

Dr. Akan Malici
Dr. Akan Malici

I had an opportunity to sit down and speak with Dr. Akan Malici, professor of Political Science at Furman University. We discussed ways in which U.S. government officials can potentially ameliorate tensions between the United States and rogue nations. One point that his article, “Rogue States: Enemies of Our Own Making?” focuses on is “unmaking” the enemy by altercasting. Altercasting is, “treating the Other in a desired way” where another country will reciprocate one’s kind gestures.

We also spoke about the current desire of Americans to respond diplomatically as opposed to militarily. Furthermore, Dr. Malici ends the interview by stating that the United States is a great country, but how do we remain so?

Listen to the entire interview below.

Dr. Akan Malici Interview

I would have to agree with Dr. Malici that past attitudes toward “rogue” states has not been beneficial to the United States. If anything, “going after them with a stick” has caused us to pour insane amounts of money into causes, leaving us with the choice of running large deficits and increasing the national debt, or having to consider making cuts in desperately needed domestic programs. And not to forget, it has continued to make relations with these countries all the more volatile. I care about the manner in which foreign policy is presented to us and the information given, because the ramifications cannot only be costly, but deadly.

Click here for more pictures and information about Dr. Malici.

A Rogue Point of View

Clockwise from left: Mohammed Mosaddeq, Dr. Akan Malici, Mohammed Reza Shah Pahlavi, Dr. Akan Malici
Clockwise from left: Mohammed Mosaddeq, Dr. Akan Malici, Mohammed Reza Shah Pahlavi, Dr. Akan Malici

Often in United States Foreign Policy, we analyze a one-sided view of international relations. However, it is worthwhile to view motivations from the point of view of the “rogue” state. By doing this, we are better able to form opinions and make foreign policy decisions.

Dr. Akan Malici, Furman University professor of political science, offers an interesting outlook on rogue state actions. Essentially, rogue actions are not always initiated by a motive or expressed threat, but are instead a response to U.S. action or the international environment. Dr. Malici’s article, “Rogue States: Enemies of Our Own Making,” offers a few anecdotal examples. I will summarize the view of Iran.

The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) had been conducting covert operations in Iran since the 1940s. The strength of the operations increased when in 1950 Mohammed Mosaddeq was democratically elected Prime Minister. U.S. Government officials, fearing losing control of the Middle Eastern oil industry and Iran to communism, took part in toppling the Mosaddeq Administration. Mosaddeq was replaced with the Shah, who had a tumultuous tenure as the leader of Iran until the 1979 revolution.

Presently, Iran is located in a region that is not entirely stable. The country has seen its neighbor Iraq overcome by U.S. forces. With this information in mind, Iran’s desire for nuclear capabilities may not be solely offensive, but partially defensive. I am not suggesting that I believe Iran should have nuclear capabilities, or that their desires are completely warranted. I am however indicating a need to review our relationships with rogue nations a little more closely. If our government has in the past or will continue to operate from the viewpoint that Iran is and has always been the sole aggressor, then we may be doomed to repeat diplomatic blunders.

Read and listen to my next post where I discuss the topic of rogue states with Dr. Malici.

Mosaddeq Photo Source, Shah Photo Courtesy of the Associated Press

Mission Statement: Rogue Nations

In my blog I will focus on U.S. Foreign Policy toward countries deemed as rogue nations. I will seek to investigate the concept of “rogue nations,” the role the phrase plays in U.S. Foreign Policy, and the way the media portrays issues involving such countries. In order to accomplish this mission, I will examine journal articles and other scholarly works pertaining to rogue states; I will interview members of the Furman and Greenville communities, and Furman professors with expertise in foreign policy and the use of language to frame and reconstitute issues; and I will examine newspaper articles and other media related to the topic.